BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vassilis Zissimopoulos

Vassilis Zissimopoulos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Calibrations Scheduling Problem with Arbitrary Lengths and Activation Length

Bender et al. (SPAA 2013) have proposed a theoretical framework for testing in contexts where safety mistakes must be avoided. Testing in such a context is made by machines that need to be often calibrated. Given that calibration costs, it is important to study policies minimizing the calibration cost while performing all the necessary tests. We focus on the single-machine setting and we extend the model proposed by Bender et al. by considering that the jobs have arbitrary processing times and that the preemption of jobs is allowed. For this case, we propose an optimal polynomial time algorithm. Then, we study the case where there are several types of calibrations with different lengths and costs. We first prove that the problem becomes NP-hard for arbitrary processing times even when the preemption of the jobs is allowed. Finally, we focus on the case of unit-time jobs and we show that a more general problem, where the recalibration of the machine is not instantaneous but takes time, can be solved in polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improved Budgeted Connected Domination and Budgeted Edge-Vertex Domination

We consider the \emph{Budgeted} version of the classical \emph{Connected Dominating Set} problem (BCDS). Given a graph $G$ and a budget $k$, we seek a connected subset of at most $k$ vertices maximizing the number of dominated vertices in $G$. We improve over the previous $(1-1/e)/13$ approximation in [Khuller, Purohit, and Sarpatwar,\ \emph{SODA 2014}] by introducing a new method for performing tree decompositions in the analysis of the last part of the algorithm. This new approach provides a $(1-1/e)/12$ approximation guarantee. By generalizing the analysis of the first part of the algorithm, we are able to modify it appropriately and obtain a further improvement to $(1-e^{-7/8})/11$. On the other hand, we prove a $(1-1/e+ε)$ inapproximability bound, for any $ε> 0$. We also examine the \emph{edge-vertex domination} variant, where an edge dominates its endpoints and all vertices neighboring them. In \emph{Budgeted Edge-Vertex Domination} (BEVD), we are given a graph $G$, and a budget $k$, and we seek a, not necessarily connected, subset of $k$ edges such that the number of dominated vertices in $G$ is maximized. We prove there exists a $(1-1/e)$-approximation algorithm. Also, for any $ε> 0$, we present a $(1-1/e+ε)$-inapproximability result by a gap-preserving reduction from the \emph{maximum coverage} problem. Finally, we examine the "dual" \emph{Partial Edge-Vertex Domination} (PEVD) problem, where a graph $G$ and a quota $n'$ are given. The goal is to select a minimum-size set of edges to dominate at least $n'$ vertices in $G$. In this case, we present a $H(n')$-approximation algorithm by a reduction to the \emph{partial cover} problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Too Much Information Kills Information: A Clustering Perspective

Clustering is one of the most fundamental tools in the artificial intelligence area, particularly in the pattern recognition and learning theory. In this paper, we propose a simple, but novel approach for variance-based k-clustering tasks, included in which is the widely known k-means clustering. The proposed approach picks a sampling subset from the given dataset and makes decisions based on the data information in the subset only. With certain assumptions, the resulting clustering is provably good to estimate the optimum of the variance-based objective with high probability. Extensive experiments on synthetic datasets and real-world datasets show that to obtain competitive results compared with k-means method (Llyod 1982) and k-means++ method (Arthur and Vassilvitskii 2007), we only need 7% information of the dataset. If we have up to 15% information of the dataset, then our algorithm outperforms both the k-means method and k-means++ method in at least 80% of the clustering tasks, in terms of the quality of clustering. Also, an extended algorithm based on the same idea guarantees a balanced k-clustering result.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access