BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Valentina Pedoia

Valentina Pedoia contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.IVComputer VisionMachine LearningQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Deep learning predicts total knee replacement from magnetic resonance images

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in the United States. When diagnosed at early stages, lifestyle interventions such as exercise and weight loss can slow OA progression, but at later stages, only an invasive option is available: total knee replacement (TKR). Though a generally successful procedure, only 2/3 of patients who undergo the procedure report their knees feeling &#39;&#39;normal&#39;&#39; post-operation, and complications can arise that require revision. This necessitates a model to identify a population at higher risk of TKR, particularly at less advanced stages of OA, such that appropriate treatments can be implemented that slow OA progression and delay TKR. Here, we present a deep learning pipeline that leverages MRI images and clinical and demographic information to predict TKR with AUC $0.834 \pm 0.036$ (p < 0.05). Most notably, the pipeline predicts TKR with AUC $0.943 \pm 0.057$ (p < 0.05) for patients without OA. Furthermore, we develop occlusion maps for case-control pairs in test data and compare regions used by the model in both, thereby identifying TKR imaging biomarkers. As such, this work takes strides towards a pipeline with clinical utility, and the biomarkers identified further our understanding of OA progression and eventual TKR onset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Development of Conditional Random Field Insert for UNet-based Zonal Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI

Purpose: A conventional 2D UNet convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture may result in ill-defined boundaries in segmentation output. Several studies imposed stronger constraints on each level of UNet to improve the performance of 2D UNet, such as SegNet. In this study, we investigated 2D SegNet and a proposed conditional random field insert (CRFI) for zonal prostate segmentation from clinical T2-weighted MRI data. Methods: We introduced a new methodology that combines SegNet and CRFI to improve the accuracy and robustness of the segmentation. CRFI has feedback connections that encourage the data consistency at multiple levels of the feature pyramid. On the encoder side of the SegNet, the CRFI combines the input feature maps and convolution block output based on their spatial local similarity, like a trainable bilateral filter. For all networks, 725 2D images (i.e., 29 MRI cases) were used in training; while, 174 2D images (i.e., 6 cases) were used in testing. Results: The SegNet with CRFI achieved the relatively high Dice coefficients (0.76, 0.84, and 0.89) for the peripheral zone, central zone, and whole gland, respectively. Compared with UNet, the SegNet+CRFIs segmentation has generally higher Dice score and showed the robustness in determining the boundaries of anatomical structures compared with the SegNet or UNet segmentation. The SegNet with a CRFI at the end showed the CRFI can correct the segmentation errors from SegNet output, generating smooth and consistent segmentation for the prostate. Conclusion: UNet based deep neural networks demonstrated in this study can perform zonal prostate segmentation, achieving high Dice coefficients compared with those in the literature. The proposed CRFI method can reduce the fuzzy boundaries that affected the segmentation performance of baseline UNet and SegNet models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hierarchical Severity Staging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries using Deep Learning with MRI Images

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for severity staging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted on 1243 knee MR images (1008 intact, 18 partially torn, 77 fully torn, and 140 reconstructed ACLs) from 224 patients (age 47 +/- 14 years, 54% women) acquired between 2011 and 2014. The radiologists used a modified scoring metric. To classify ACL injuries with deep learning, two types of CNNs were used, one with three-dimensional (3D) and the other with two-dimensional (2D) convolutional kernels. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, weighted Cohen&#39;s kappa, and overall accuracy, followed by McNemar&#39;s test to compare the CNNs performance. Results: The overall accuracy and weighted Cohen&#39;s kappa reported for ACL injury classification were higher using the 2D CNN (accuracy: 92% (233/254) and kappa: 0.83) than the 3D CNN (accuracy: 89% (225/254) and kappa: 0.83) (P = .27). The 2D CNN and 3D CNN performed similarly in classifying intact ACLs (2D CNN: 93% (188/203) sensitivity and 90% (46/51) specificity; 3D CNN: 89% (180/203) sensitivity and 88% (45/51) specificity). Classification of full tears by both networks were also comparable (2D CNN: 82% (14/17) sensitivity and 94% (222/237) specificity; 3D CNN: 76% (13/17) sensitivity and 100% (236/237) specificity). The 2D CNN classified all reconstructed ACLs correctly. Conclusion: 2D and 3D CNNs applied to ACL lesion classification had high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that these networks could be used to help grade ACL injuries by non-experts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset

Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for monitoring osteoarthritis progression. Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a hold-out test set. Similarities in network segmentations were evaluated using pairwise Dice correlations. Articular cartilage thickness was computed per-scan and longitudinally. Correlation between thickness error and segmentation metrics was measured using Pearson&#39;s coefficient. Two empirical upper bounds for ensemble performance were computed using combinations of model outputs that consolidated true positives and true negatives. Results: Six teams (T1-T6) submitted entries for the challenge. No significant differences were observed across all segmentation metrics for all tissues (p=1.0) among the four top-performing networks (T2, T3, T4, T6). Dice correlations between network pairs were high (>0.85). Per-scan thickness errors were negligible among T1-T4 (p=0.99) and longitudinal changes showed minimal bias (<0.03mm). Low correlations (<0.41) were observed between segmentation metrics and thickness error. The majority-vote ensemble was comparable to top performing networks (p=1.0). Empirical upper bound performances were similar for both combinations (p=1.0). Conclusion: Diverse networks learned to segment the knee similarly where high segmentation accuracy did not correlate to cartilage thickness accuracy. Voting ensembles did not outperform individual networks but may help regularize individual models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access