Source author record

Valentin Bouquet

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
2topics
3close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

The bondage number of chordal graphs

A set S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) of a graph GG is a dominating set if each vertex has a neighbor in SS or belongs to SS. Let γ(G)γ(G) be the cardinality of a minimum dominating set in GG. The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a graph GG is the smallest cardinality of a set edges A⊆E(G)A\subseteq E(G) such that γ(G−A)=γ(G)+1γ(G-A)=γ(G)+1. A chordal graph is a graph with no induced cycle of length four or more. In this paper, we prove that the bondage number of a chordal graph GG is at most the order of its maximum clique, that is, b(G)≤ω(G)b(G)\leq ω(G). We show that this bound is best possible.

preprint2022arXiv

The complexity of the bondage problem in planar graphs

A set S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) of a graph GG is a dominating set if each vertex has a neighbor in SS or belongs to SS. Let γ(G)γ(G) be the cardinality of a minimum dominating set in GG. The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a graph GG is the smallest cardinality of a set of edges A⊆E(G)A\subseteq E(G), such that γ(G−A)=γ(G)+1γ(G-A)=γ(G)+1. The dd-Bondage is the problem of deciding, given a graph GG and an integer d≥1d\geq 1, if b(G)≤db(G)\leq d. This problem is known to be NP\mathsf{NP}-hard even for bipartite graphs and d=1d=1. In this paper, we show that 11-Bondage is NP\mathsf{NP}-hard, even for the class of 33-regular planar graphs, the class of subcubic claw-free graphs, and the class of bipartite planar graphs of maximum degree 33, with girth kk, for any fixed k≥3k\geq 3. On the positive side, for any planar graph GG of girth at least 88, we show that we can find, in polynomial time, a set of three edges AA such that γ(G−A)>γ(G)γ(G-A)>γ(G). Last, we exposed some classes of graphs for which Dominating Set can be solved in polynomial time, and where dd-Bondage can also be solved in polynomial time, for any fixed d≥1d\geq 1.

preprint2020arXiv

On Minimum Dominating Sets in cubic and (claw,H)-free graphs

Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), S⊆VS\subseteq V is a dominating set if every v∈V∖Sv\in V\setminus S is adjacent to an element of SS. The Minimum Dominating Set problem asks for a dominating set with minimum cardinality. It is well known that its decision version is NPNP-complete even when GG is a claw-free graph. We give a complexity dichotomy for the Minimum Dominating Set problem for the class of (claw,H)(claw, H)-free graphs when HH has at most six vertices. In an intermediate step we show that the Minimum Dominating Set problem is NPNP-complete for cubic graphs.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.