BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vadim E. Levit

Vadim E. Levit contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.GRComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theorymath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
42works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

42 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Linear Algorithm for Computing Independence Polynomials of Trees

An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set in the graph $G = (V, E)$. Gutman and Harary defined the independence polynomial of $G$ \[ I(G;x) = \sum_{k=0}^{α(G)}{s_k}x^{k}={s_0}+{s_1}x+{s_2}x^{2}+...+{s_{α(G)}}x^{α(G)}, \] where $s_k$ denotes the number of independent sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$. A comprehensive survey on the subject is due to Levit and Mandrescu, where some recursive formulas are allowing to calculate the independence polynomial. A direct implementation of these recursions does not bring about an efficient algorithm. Yosef, Mizrachi, and Kadrawi developed an efficient way for computing the independence polynomials of trees with $n$ vertices, such that a database containing all of the independence polynomials of all the trees with up to $n-1$ vertices is required. This approach is not suitable for big trees, as an extensive database is needed. On the other hand, using dynamic programming, it is possible to develop an efficient algorithm that prevents repeated calculations. In summary, our dynamic programming algorithm runs over a tree in linear time and does not depend on a database.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fair Division Algorithms for Electricity Distribution

In many developing countries, the total electricity demand is larger than the limited generation capacity of power stations. Many countries adopt the common practice of routine load shedding - disconnecting entire regions from the power supply - to maintain a balance between demand and supply. Load shedding results in inflicting hardship and discomfort on households, which is even worse and hence unfair to those whose need for electricity is higher than that of others during load shedding hours. Recently, Oluwasuji et al. [2020] presented this problem and suggested several heuristic solutions. In this work, we study the electricity distribution problem as a problem of fair division, model it using the related literature on cake-cutting problems, and discuss some insights on which parts of the time intervals are allocated to each household. We consider four cases: identical demand, uniform utilities; identical demand, additive utilities; different demand, uniform utilities; different demand, additive utilities. We provide the solution for the first two cases and discuss the novel concept of q-times bin packing in relation to the remaining cases. We also show how the fourth case is related to the consensus k-division problem. One can study objectives and constraints using utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare metrics, as well as trying to keep the number of cuts as small as possible. A secondary objective can be to minimize the maximum utility-difference between agents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Minimal Critical Independent Sets of Almost Bipartite non-Konig-Egervary Graphs

The independence number $α(G)$ is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$. If $α(G)+μ(G)$ equals the order of $G$, then $G$ is called a Konig-Egervary graph. The number $d\left( G\right) =\max\{\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N\left( A\right) \right\vert :A\subseteq V\}$ is called the critical difference of $G$ (where $N\left( A\right) =\left\{ v:v\in V,N\left( v\right) \cap A\neq\emptyset\right\} $). It is known that $α(G)-μ(G)\leq d\left( G\right) $ holds for every graph. A graph $G$ is unicyclic if it has a unique cycle and almost bipartite if it has only one odd cycle. Let $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=\bigcap\left\{ S:S\text{ is a critical independent set}\right\} $, $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ be the intersection of all maximum independent sets, and $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $ be the union of all maximum independent sets of $G$. It is known that $\mathrm{\ker}(G)\subseteq\mathrm{core}(G)$ is true for every graph, while the equality holds for bipartite graphs, and for unicyclic non-Konig-Egervary graphs. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is an almost bipartite non-Konig-Egervary graph, then $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=$ $\mathrm{core}(G)$, $\mathrm{corona}(G)$ $\cup$ $N(\mathrm{core} \left( G\right) )=V(G)$, and $\left\vert \mathrm{corona}(G)\right\vert +\left\vert \mathrm{core}(G)\right\vert =2α(G)+1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Critical sets, crowns, and local maximum independent sets

A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is independent (or stable) if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the set of all independent sets of $G$. A set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical (and we write $A\in CritIndep(G)$) if $\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N(A)\right\vert =\max\{\left\vert I\right\vert -\left\vert N(I)\right\vert :I\in \mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $N(I)$ denotes the neighborhood of $I$. If $S\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ and there is a matching from $N(S)$ into $S$, then $S$ is a crown, and we write $S\in Crown(G)$. Let $Ψ(G)$ be the family of all local maximum independent sets of graph $G$, i.e., $S\inΨ(G)$ if $S$ is a maximum independent set in the subgraph induced by $S\cup N(S)$. In this paper we show that $CritIndep(G)\subseteq Crown(G)$ $\subseteqΨ(G)$ are true for every graph. In addition, we present some classes of graphs where these families coincide and form greedoids or even more general set systems that we call augmentoids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Computing Unique Maximum Matchings in O(m) time for Konig-Egervary Graphs and Unicyclic Graphs

Let alpha(G) denote the maximum size of an independent set of vertices and mu(G) be the cardinality of a maximum matching in a graph G. A matching saturating all the vertices is perfect. If alpha(G) + mu(G) equals the number of vertices of G, then it is called a Konig-Egervary graph. A graph is unicyclic if it has a unique cycle. In 2010, Bartha conjectured that a unique perfect matching, if it exists, can be found in O(m) time, where m is the number of edges. In this paper we validate this conjecture for Konig-Egervary graphs and unicylic graphs. We propose a variation of Karp-Sipser leaf-removal algorithm (Karp and Spiser, 1981), which ends with an empty graph if and only if the original graph is a Konig-Egervary graph with a unique perfect matching obtained as an output as well. We also show that a unicyclic non-bipartite graph G may have at most one perfect matching, and this is the case where G is a Konig-Egervary graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Critical Independent Sets of a Graph

Let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V\left( G\right) $. A set $S\subseteq V\left( G\right) $ is independent if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the family of all independent sets of $G$. The number $d\left( X\right) =$ $\left\vert X\right\vert -\left\vert N(X)\right\vert $ is the difference of $X\subseteq V\left( G\right) $, and a set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical if $d(A)=\max \{d\left( I\right) :I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$ (Zhang, 1990). Let us recall the following definitions: $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a maximum independent set}. $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right)$ = $\bigcup$ {S :S is a maximum independent set}. $\mathrm{\ker}(G)$ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a critical independent set}. $\mathrm{diadem}(G)$ = $\bigcup$ {S : S is a critical independent set}. In this paper we present various structural properties of $\mathrm{\ker}(G)$, in relation with $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $, $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $, and $\mathrm{diadem}(G)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Hultman Numbers and Generalized Commuting Probability in Finite Groups

Let $G$ be a finite group and $π$ be a permutation from $S_{n}$. We investigate the distribution of the probabilities of the equality \[ a_{1}a_{2}\cdots a_{n-1}a_{n}=a_{π_{1}}a_{π_{2}}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}a_{π_{n}} \] when $π$ varies over all the permutations in $S_{n}$. The probability \[ Pr_π(G)=Pr(a_{1}a_{2}\cdots a_{n-1}a_{n}=a_{π_{1}}a_{π_{2}}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}a_{π_{n}}) \] is identical to $Pr_{1}^ω(G)$, with \[ ω=a_{1}a_{2}...a_{n-1}a_{n}a_{π_{1}}^{-1}a_{π_{2}}^{-1}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}^{-1}a_{π_{n}}^{-1}, \] as it is defined in \cite{DasNath1} and \cite{NathDash1}. The notion of commutativity degree, or the probability of a permutation equality $a_{1}a_{2}=a_{2}a_{1}$, for which $n=2$ and $π=\langle2\;\;1\rangle$, was introduced and assessed by P. Erdös and P. Turan in \cite{ET} in 1968 and by W. H. Gustafson in \cite{G} in 1973. In \cite{G} Gustafson establishes a relation between the probability of $a_{1},a_{2}\in G$ commuting and the number of conjugacy classes in $G$. In this work we define several other parameters, which depend only on a certain interplay between the conjugacy classes of $G$, and compute the probabilities of general permutation equalities in terms of these parameters. It turns out that this probability, for a permutation $π$, depends only on the number $c(Gr(π))$ of the alternating cycles in the cycle graph $Gr(π)$ of $π$. The cycle graph of a permutation was introduced by V. Bafna and P. A. Pevzner in \cite{BP}. We describe the spectrum of the probabilities of permutation equalities in a finite group as $π$ varies over all the elements of $S_{n}$. This spectrum turns-out to be closely related to the partition of $n!$ into a sum of the corresponding Hultman numbers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Well-dominated graphs without cycles of lengths 4 and 5

Let $G$ be a graph. A set $S$ of vertices in $G$ dominates the graph if every vertex of $G$ is either in $S$ or a neighbor of a vertex in $S$. Finding a minimal cardinality set which dominates the graph is an NP-complete problem. The graph $G$ is well-dominated if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same cardinality. The complexity status of recognizing well-dominated graphs is not known. We show that recognizing well-dominated graphs can be done polynomially for graphs without cycles of lengths $4$ and $5$, by proving that a graph belonging to this family is well-dominated if and only if it is well-covered. Assume that a weight function $w$ is defined on the vertices of $G$. Then $G$ is $w$-well-dominated} if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same weight. We prove that the set of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-dominated is a vector space, and denote that vector space by $WWD(G)$. We prove that $WWD(G)$ is a subspace of $WCW(G)$, the vector space of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered. We provide a polynomial characterization of $WWD(G)$ for the case that $G$ does not contain cycles of lengths $4$, $5$, and $6$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Balanced Abelian group valued functions on directed graphs

We discuss functions from the edges and vertices of a directed graph to an Abelian group. Such functions, when the sum of their values along any cycle is zero, are called balanced and form an Abelian group. We study this group in two cases: when we allowed to walk against the direction of an edge taking the opposite value of the function and when we are not allowed to walk against the direction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Fibonacci Graphs and their Expressions

The paper investigates relationship between algebraic expressions and graphs. We consider a digraph called a Fibonacci graph which gives a generic example of non-series-parallel graphs. Our intention in this paper is to simplify the expressions of Fibonacci graphs and eventually find their shortest representations. With that end in view, we describe the number of methods for generating Fibonacci graph expressions and carry out their comparative analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On f-Symmetries of the Independence Polynomial

An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices, and a(G) is the size of a maximum independent set in the graph G. If s_{k} is the number of independent sets of cardinality k in G, then I(G;x)=s_0+s_1*x+s_2*x^2+...+s_a*x^a,a=a(G), is called the independence polynomial of G (I. Gutman and F. Harary, 1983). If s_{a-i}=f(i)*s_{i} holds for every i, then I(G;x) is called f-symmetric (f-palindromic). If f(i)=1, then I(G;x) is symmetric (palindromic). The corona of the graphs G and H is the graph G*H obtained by joining each vertex of G to all the vertices of a copy of H. In this paper we show that if H is a graph with p vertices, q edges, and alpha(H)=2, then I(G*H;x) is f-symmetric for some elegant function f. In particular, if H = K_{r}-e, we show that I(G*H;x) is symmetric and unimodal, with a unique mode. This finding generalizes results due to (Stevanovic, 1998) and (Mandrescu, 2012) claiming that I(G*(K_2-e);x)=I(G*2K_1;x) is symmetric and unimodal for every graph G.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the Optimal Representation of Algebraic Expressions of Fibonacci Graphs

The paper investigates relationship between algebraic expressions and graphs. We consider a digraph called a Fibonacci graph which gives a generic example of non-series-parallel graphs. Our intention in this paper is to simplify the expressions of Fibonacci graphs and eventually find their shortest representations. With that end in view, we describe the optimal decomposition method for generating Fibonacci graph expressions that is conjectured to provide these representations. Proof (or disproof) of this conjecture is presented as an open problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Structure of the Group of Balanced Labelings on Graphs, its Subgroups and Quotient Groups

We discuss functions from edges and vertices of an undirected graph to an Abelian group. Such functions, when the sum of their values along any cycle is zero, are called balanced labelings. The set of balanced labelings forms an Abelian group. We study the structure of this group and the structure of two closely related to it groups: the subgroup of balanced labelings which consists of functions vanishing on vertices and the corresponding factor-group. This work is completely self-contained, except the algorithm for obtaining the 3-edge-connected components of an undirected graph, for which we make appropriate references to the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Weighted Well-Covered Claw-Free Graphs

A graph G is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on its vertices. Then G is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-well-covered is a vector space. Given an input claw-free graph G, we present an O(n^6)algortihm, whose input is a claw-free graph G, and output is the vector space of weight functions w, for which G is w-well-covered. A graph G is equimatchable if all its maximal matchings are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on the edges of G. Then G is w-equimatchable if all its maximal matchings are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-equimatchable is a vector space. We present an O(m*n^4 + n^5*log(n)) algorithm which receives an input graph G, and outputs the vector space of weight functions w such that G is w-equimatchable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A One-Vertex Decomposition Algorithm for Generating Algebraic Expressions of Square Rhomboids

The paper investigates relationship between algebraic expressions and graphs. We consider a digraph called a square rhomboid that is an example of non-series-parallel graphs. Our intention is to simplify the expressions of square rhomboids and eventually find their shortest representations. With that end in view, we describe the new algorithm for generating square rhomboid expressions, which improves on our previous algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A Set and Collection Lemma

A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. In this paper we prove that if F is a collection of maximum independent sets of a graph, then there is a matching from S-{intersection of all members of F} into {union of all members of F}-S, for every independent set S. Based on this finding we give alternative proofs for a number of well-known lemmata, as the "Maximum Stable Set Lemma" due to Claude Berge and the "Clique Collection Lemma" due to András Hajnal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

An Algorithm Computing the Core of a Konig-Egervary Graph

A set S of vertices is independent in a graph G if no two vertices from S are adjacent, and alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum independent set of G. G is called a Konig-Egervary graph if its order equals alpha(G)+mu(G), where mu(G) denotes the size of a maximum matching. By core(G) we mean the intersection of all maximum independent sets of G. To decide whether core(G) is empty is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, we present some polynomial time algorithms finding core(G) of a Konig-Egervary graph G.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Critical Sets in Bipartite Graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent, alpha(G) is the size of a maximum independent set, and core(G) is the intersection of all maximum independent sets. The number d(X)=|X|-|N(X)| is the difference of the set X, and d_{c}(G)=max{d(I):I is an independent set} is called the critical difference of G. A set X is critical if d(X)=d_{c}(G). For a graph G we define ker(G) as the intersection of all critical independent sets, while diadem(G) is the union of all critical independent sets. For a bipartite graph G=(A,B,E), with bipartition {A,B}, Ore defined delta(X)=d(X) for every subset X of A, while delta_0(A)=max{delta(X):X is a subset of A}. Similarly is defined delta_0(B). In this paper we prove that for every bipartite graph G=(A,B,E) the following assertions hold: d_{c}(G)=delta_0(A)+delta_0(B); ker(G)=core(G); |ker(G)|+|diadem(G)|=2*alpha(G).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Local Maximum Stable Sets Greedoids Stemmed from Very Well-Covered Graphs

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is called a local maximum stable set of G if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by the closed neighborhood of S. A greedoid (V,F) is called a local maximum stable set greedoid if there exists a graph G=(V,E) such that its family of local maximum stable sets coinsides with (V,F). It has been shown that the family local maximum stable sets of a forest T forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we demonstrate that if G is a very well-covered graph, then its family of local maximum stable sets is a greedoid if and only if G has a unique perfect matching.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On Symmetry of Independence Polynomials

An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices, and alpha(G) is the size of a maximum independent set in the graph G. A matching is a set of non-incident edges, while mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching. If s_{k} is the number of independent sets of cardinality k in G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+s_{2}x^{2}+...+s_{α(G)}x^{α(G)} is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). If $s_{j}=s_{α-j}$, 0=< j =< alpha(G), then I(G;x) is called symmetric (or palindromic). It is known that the graph G*2K_{1} obtained by joining each vertex of G to two new vertices, has a symmetric independence polynomial (Stevanovic, 1998). In this paper we show that for every graph G and for each non-negative integer k =< mu(G), one can build a graph H, such that: G is a subgraph of H, I(H;x) is symmetric, and I(G*2K_{1};x)=(1+x)^{k}*I(H;x).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the Core of a Unicyclic Graph

A set S is independent in a graph G if no two vertices from S are adjacent. By core(G) we mean the intersection of all maximum independent sets. The independence number alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching in G. A connected graph having only one cycle, say C, is a unicyclic graph. In this paper we prove that if G is a unicyclic graph of order n and n-1 = alpha(G) + mu(G), then core(G) coincides with the union of cores of all trees in G-C.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the Intersection of All Critical Sets of a Unicyclic Graph

A set S is independent in a graph G if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The independence number alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching in G. If alpha(G)+mu(G)=|V|, then G=(V,E) is called a Konig-Egervary graph. The number d_{c}(G)=max{|A|-|N(A)|} is called the critical difference of G (Zhang, 1990). By core(G) (corona(G)) we denote the intersection (union, respectively) of all maximum independent sets, while by ker(G) we mean the intersection of all critical independent sets. A connected graph having only one cycle is called unicyclic. It is known that ker(G) is a subset of core(G) for every graph G, while the equality is true for bipartite graphs (Levit and Mandrescu, 2011). For Konig-Egervary unicyclic graphs, the difference |core(G)|-|ker(G)| may equal any non-negative integer. In this paper we prove that if G is a non-Konig-Egervary unicyclic graph, then: (i) ker(G)= core(G) and (ii) |corona(G)|+|core(G)|=2*alpha(G)+1. Pay attention that |corona(G)|+|core(G)|=2*alpha(G) holds for every Konig-Egervary graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the Structure of the Minimum Critical Independent Set of a Graph

Let G=(V,E). A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The number d(X)= |X|-|N(X)| is the difference of X, and an independent set A is critical if d(A) = max{d(I):I is an independent set}. Let us recall that ker(G) is the intersection of all critical independent sets, and core(G) is the intersection of all maximum independent sets. Recently, it was established that ker(G) is a subset of core(G) is true for every graph, while the corresponding equality holds for bipartite graphs. In this paper we present various structural properties of ker(G). The main finding claims that ker(G) is equal to the union of all inclusion minimal independent sets with positive difference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Vertices Belonging to All Critical Independent Sets of a Graph

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The independence number alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, and mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching. The number id_{c}(G)=max{|I|-|N(I)|:I is an independent set} is called the critical independence difference of G, and A is critical if |A|-|N(A)|=id_{c}(G). We define core(G) as the intersection of all maximum independent sets, and ker(G)as the intersection of all critical independent sets. In this paper we prove that if a graph G is non-quasi-regularizable (i.e., there exists some independent set A, such that |A|>|N(A)|), then: ker(G) is a subset of core(G), and |ker(G)|> id_{c}(G) >= alpha(G)-mu(G) > 0.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On the independence polynomial of an antiregular graph

A graph with at most two vertices of the same degree is called antiregular (Merris 2003), maximally nonregular (Zykov 1990) or quasiperfect (Behzad, Chartrand 1967). If s_{k} is the number of independent sets of cardinality k in a graph G, then I(G;x) = s_{0} + s_{1}x + ... + s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G (Gutman, Harary 1983), where alpha = alpha(G) is the size of a maximum independent set. In this paper we derive closed formulae for the independence polynomials of antiregular graphs. In particular, we deduce that every antiregular graph A is uniquely defined by its independence polynomial I(A;x), within the family of threshold graphs. Moreover, I(A;x) is logconcave with at most two real roots, and I(A;-1) belongs to {-1,0}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Very Well-Covered Graphs of Girth at least Four and Local Maximum Stable Set Greedoids

A \textit{maximum stable set} in a graph $G$ is a stable set of maximum cardinality. $S$ is a \textit{local maximum stable set} of $G$, and we write $S\inΨ(G)$, if $S$ is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by $S\cup N(S)$, where $N(S)$ is the neighborhood of $S$. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. (1975), proved that any $S\inΨ(G)$ is a subset of a maximum stable set of $G$. In (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002) we have shown that the family $Ψ(T)$ of a forest $T$ forms a greedoid on its vertex set. The cases where $G$ is bipartite, triangle-free, well-covered, while $Ψ(G)$ is a greedoid, were analyzed in (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002),(Levit & Mandrescu, 2004),(Levit & Mandrescu, 2007), respectively. In this paper we demonstrate that if $G$ is a very well-covered graph of girth $\geq4$, then the family $Ψ(G)$ is a greedoid if and only if $G$ has a unique perfect matching.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Weighted Well-Covered Graphs without Cycles of Length 4, 5, 6 and 7

A graph is well-covered if every maximal independent set has the same cardinality. The recognition problem of well-covered graphs is known to be co-NP-complete. Let w be a weight function defined on the vertices of G. Then G is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets of G are of the same weight. The set of weight functions w for which a graph is w-well-covered is a vector space. We prove that finding the vector space of weight functions under which an input graph is w-well-covered can be done in polynomial time, if the input graph does not contain cycles of length 4, 5, 6 and 7.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

A Simple Proof of an Inequality Connecting the Alternating Number of Independent Sets and the Decycling Number

If alpha=alpha(G) is the maximum size of an independent set and s_{k} equals the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+...+s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G. In this paper we provide an elementary proof of the inequality claiming that the absolute value of I(G;-1) is not greater than 2^phi(G), for every graph G, where phi(G) is its decycling number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Critical independent sets and Konig--Egervary graphs

Let alpha(G) be the cardinality of a independence set of maximum size in the graph G, while mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching. G is a Konig--Egervary graph if its order equals alpha(G) + mu(G). The set core(G) is the intersection of all maximum independent sets of G (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002). The number def(G)=|V(G)|-2*mu(G) is the deficiency of G (Lovasz & Plummer, 1986). The number d(G)=max{|S|-|N(S)|:S in Ind(G)} is the critical difference of G. An independent set A is critical if |A|-|N(A)|=d(G), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S (Zhang, 1990). In 2009, Larson showed that G is Konig--Egervary graph if and only if there exists a maximum independent set that is critical as well. In this paper we prove that: (i) d(G)=|core(G)|-|N(core(G))|=alpha(G)-mu(G)=def(G) for every Konig--Egervary graph G; (ii) G is Konig--Egervary graph if and only if every maximum independent set of G is critical.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Greedoids on Vertex Sets of Unicycle Graphs

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. It is known that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. Bipartite, triangle-free, and well-covered graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids have been analyzed as well. A unicycle graph owns only one cycle. In this paper we characterize the unicycle graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

On Konig-Egervary Square-Stable Graphs

The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a maximum stable set, and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. If alpha(G)+mu(G) equals its order, then G is a Konig-Egervary graph. In this paper we deal with square-stable graphs, i.e., the graphs G enjoying the equality alpha(G)=alpha(G^{2}), where G^{2} denotes the second power of G. In particular, we show that a Konig-Egervary graph is square-stable if and only if it has a perfect matching consisting of pendant edges, and in consequence, we deduce that well-covered trees are exactly the square-stable trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

The independence polynomial of a graph at -1

If alpha=alpha(G) is the maximum size of an independent set and s_{k} equals the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+...+s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G. In this paper we prove that: 1. I(T;-1) equels either -1 or 0 or 1 for every tree T; 2. I(G;-1)=0 for every connected well-covered graph G of girth > 5, non-isomorphic to C_{7} or K_{2}; 3. the absolute value of I(G;-1) is not greater than 2^nu(G), for every graph G, where nu(G) is its cyclomatic number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Duality between quasi-concave functions and monotone linkage functions

A function $F$ defined on all subsets of a finite ground set $E$ is quasi-concave if $F(X\cup Y)\geq\min\{F(X),F(Y)\}$ for all $X,Y\subset E$. Quasi-concave functions arise in many fields of mathematics and computer science such as social choice, theory of graph, data mining, clustering and other fields. The maximization of quasi-concave function takes, in general, exponential time. However, if a quasi-concave function is defined by associated monotone linkage function then it can be optimized by the greedy type algorithm in a polynomial time. Quasi-concave functions defined as minimum values of monotone linkage functions were considered on antimatroids, where the correspondence between quasi-concave and bottleneck functions was shown (Kempner & Levit, 2003). The goal of this paper is to analyze quasi-concave functions on different families of sets and to investigate their relationships with monotone linkage functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Geometry of antimatroidal point sets

The notion of &#34;antimatroid with repetition&#34; was conceived by Bjorner, Lovasz and Shor in 1991 as a multiset extension of the notion of antimatroid. When the underlying set consists of only two elements, such two-dimensional antimatroids correspond to point sets in the plane. In this research we concentrate on geometrical properties of antimatroidal point sets in the plane and prove that these sets are exactly parallelogram polyominoes. Our results imply that two-dimensional antimatroids have convex dimension 2. The second part of the research is devoted to geometrical properties of three-dimensional antimatroids closed under intersection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Graph Operations that are Good for Greedoids

S is a local maximum stable set of a graph G, if the set S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. In (Levit, Mandrescu, 2002) we have proved that the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid for every forest. The cases of bipartite graphs and triangle-free graphs were analyzed in (Levit, Mandrescu, 2004) and (Levit, Mandrescu, 2007), respectively. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the family of all local maximum stable sets of a graph G to form a greedoid, where G is: (a) the disjoint union of a family of graphs; (b) the Zykov sum of a family of graphs, or (c) the corona X*{H_1,H_2,...,H_n} obtained by joining each vertex k of a graph X to all the vertices of a graph H_k.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Interval greedoids and families of local maximum stable sets of graphs

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved in 1975 that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In 2002 we showed that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. The cases where G is bipartite, triangle-free, well-covered, while the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid, were analyzed in 2004, 2007, and 2008, respectively. In this paper we demonstrate that if the family of all local maximum stable sets of the graph satisfies the accessibility property, then it is an interval greedoid. We also characterize those graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets are either antimatroids or matroids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

On Duality between Local Maximum Stable Sets of a Graph and its Line-Graph

G is a Koenig-Egervary graph provided alpha(G)+ mu(G)=|V(G)|, where mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching and alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum stable set. S is a local maximum stable set of G if S is a maximum stable set of the closed neighborhood of S. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In this paper we demonstrate that if S is a local maximum stable set, the subgraph H induced by the closed neighborhood of S is a Koenig-Egervary graph, and M is a maximum matching in H, then M is a local maximum stable set in the line graph of G.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Quasi-concave functions on antimatroids

In this paper we consider quasi-concave set functions defined on antimatroids. There are many equivalent axiomatizations of antimatroids, that may be separated into two categories: antimatroids defined as set systems and antimatroids defined as languages. An algorthmic characterization of antimatroids, that considers them as set systems, was given in (Kempner, Levit 2003). This characterization is based on the idea of optimization using set functions defined as minimum values of linkages between a set and the elements from the set complement. Such set functions are quasi-concave. Their behavior on antimatroids was studied in (Kempner, Muchnik 2003), where they were applied to constraint clustering. In this work we investigate a duality between quasi-concave set functions and linkage functions. Our main finding is that quasi-concave set functions on an antimatroid may be represented as minimum values of some monotone linkage functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Very well-covered graphs with log-concave independence polynomials

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial $I(G;x)$ is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal, whenever $G$ is a forest, while Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal for any well-covered graph G. Michael and Traves (2003) showed that the assertion is false for well-covered graphs with $a(G)$ > 3 ($a(G)$ is the size of a maximum stable set of the graph $G$), while for very well-covered graphs the conjecture is still open. In this paper we give support to both conjectures by demonstrating that if $a(G)$ < 4, or $G$ belongs to ${K_{1,n}, P_{n}: n > 0}$, then $I(G*;x)$ is log-concave, and, hence, unimodal (where $G*$ is the very well-covered graph obtained from $G$ by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access