BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vadim A. Markel

Vadim A. Markel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallphysics.med-phquant-phmath-phmath.MP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Theoretical and numerical analysis of current-driven electromagnetic homogenization and the problem of effective medium parameters for finite samples

Reflection and refraction of electromagnetic waves by artificial periodic composites (metamaterials) can be accurately modeled by an effective medium theory only if the boundary of the medium is explicitly taken into account and the two effective parameters of the medium -- the index of refraction and the impedance -- are correctly determined. Theories that consider infinite periodic composites do not satisfy the above condition. As a result, they cannot model reflection and transmission by finite samples with the desired accuracy and are not useful for design of metamaterial-based devices. As an instructive case in point, we consider the "current-driven" homogenization theory, which has recently gained popularity. We apply this theory to the case of one-dimensional periodic medium wherein both exact and homogenization results can be obtained analytically in closed form. We show that, beyond the well-understood zero-cell limit, the current-driven homogenization result is inconsistent with the exact reflection and transmission characteristics of the slab.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Quantum theory of electric polarization nonlinearity in metal nanofilms

We develop a quantum theory of electron confinement in metal nanofilms. The theory is used to compute the nonlinear response of the film to a static or low-frequency external electric field and to investigate the role of boundary conditions imposed on the metal surface. We find that the sign and magnitude of the nonlinear polarizability depends dramatically on the type of boundary condition used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Theoretical and numerical investigation of the size-dependent optical effects in metal nanoparticles

We further develop the theory of quantum finite-size effects in metallic nanoparticles, which was originally formulated by Hache, Ricard and Flytzanis [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1647 (1986)] and (in a somewhat corrected form) by Rautian [Sov. Phys. JETP 85, 451 (1997)]. These references consider a metal nanoparticle as a degenerate Fermi gas of conduction electrons in an infinitely-high spherical potential well. This model (referred to as the HRFR model below) yields mathematical expressions for the linear and the third-order nonlinear polarizabilities of a nanoparticle in terms of infinite nested series. These series have not been evaluated numerically so far and, in the case of nonlinear polarizability, they can not be evaluated with the use of conventional computers due to the high computational complexity involved. Rautian has derived a set of remarkable analytical approximations to the series but direct numerical verification of Rautian's approximate formulas remained a formidable challenge. In this work, we derive an expression for the third-order nonlinear polarizability, which is exact within the HRFR model but amenable to numerical implementation. We then evaluate the expressions obtained by us numerically for both linear and nonlinear polarizabilities. We investigate the limits of applicability of Rautian's approximations and find that they are surprizingly accurate in a wide range of physical parameters. We also discuss the limits of small frequencies (comparable or below the Drude relaxation constant) and of large particle sizes (the bulk limit) and show that these limits are problematic for the HRFR model, irrespectively of any additional approximations used. Finally, we compare the HRFR model to the purely classical theory of nonlinear polarization of metal nanoparticles developed by us earlier [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 47402 (2008)].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Comment on "Poynting vector, heating rate, and stored energy in structured materials: A first principles derivation"

In this Comment I argue that Silveirinha's criticism of my earlier work [M.G.Silveirinha, Phys.Rev.B 80, 235120 2009)] is based on an unphysical excitation model which involves an "external current" which overlaps with a continuous medium but is not subject to constitutive relations. When this excitation model is replaced by the conventional and experimentally-relevant model of excitation by external electromagnetic fields, it can be easily shown that Silveirinha's formulas contain the very results he wanted to disprove. This and a few other misconceptions present in Silveirinha's paper are subject of this Comment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Inversion formulas for the broken-ray Radon transform

We consider the inverse problem of the broken ray transform (sometimes also referred to as the V-line transform). Explicit image reconstruction formulas are derived and tested numerically. The obtained formulas are generalizations of the filtered backprojection formula of the conventional Radon transform. The advantages of the broken ray transform include the possibility to reconstruct the absorption and the scattering coefficients of the medium simultaneously and the possibility to utilize scattered radiation which, in the case of the conventional X-ray tomography, is typically discarded.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Single-Scattering Optical Tomography: Simultaneous Reconstruction of Scattering and Absorption

We demonstrate that simultaneous reconstruction of scattering and absorption of a mesoscopic system using angularly-resolved measurements of scattered light intensity is possible. Image reconstruction is realized based on the algebraic inversion of a generalized Radon transform relating the scattering and absorption coefficients of the medium to the measured light intensity and derived using the single-scattering approximation to the radiative transport equation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access