Source author record

V. J. Vieland

V. J. Vieland appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
7topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

An Evidential Interpretation of the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics

I argue here that both the first and second laws of thermodynamics, generally understood to be quintessentially physical in nature, can be equally well described as being about certain types of information without the need to invoke physical manifestations for information. In particular, I show that the statistician's familiar likelihood principle is a general conservation principle on a par with the first law, and that likelihood itself involves a form of irrecoverable information loss that can be expressed in the form of (one version of) the second law. Each of these principles involves a particular type of information, and requires its own form of bookkeeping to properly account for information accumulation. I illustrate both sets of books with a simple coin-tossing (binomial) experiment. In thermodynamics, absolute temperature T is the link that relates energy-based and entropy-based bookkeeping systems. I consider the information-based analogue of this link, denoted here as E, and show that E has a meaningful interpretation in its own right in connection with statistical inference. These results contribute to a growing body of theory at the intersection of thermodynamics, information theory and statistical inference, and suggest a novel framework in which E itself for the first time plays a starring role.

preprint2013arXiv

Measurement of statistical evidence on an absolute scale following thermodynamic principles

Statistical analysis is used throughout biomedical research and elsewhere to assess strength of evidence. We have previously argued that typical outcome statistics (including p-values and maximum likelihood ratios) have poor measure-theoretic properties: they can erroneously indicate decreasing evidence as data supporting an hypothesis accumulate; and they are not amenable to calibration, necessary for meaningful comparison of evidence across different study designs, data types, and levels of analysis. We have also previously proposed that thermodynamic theory, which allowed for the first time derivation of an absolute measurement scale for temperature (T), could be used to derive an absolute scale for evidence (E). Here we present a novel thermodynamically-based framework in which measurement of E on an absolute scale, for which "one degree" always means the same thing, becomes possible for the first time. The new framework invites us to think about statistical analyses in terms of the flow of (evidential) information, placing this work in the context of a growing literature on connections among physics, information theory, and statistics.