BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tsung-Hao Huang

Tsung-Hao Huang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
DatabasesMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Comparing Ordering Strategies For Process Discovery Using Synthesis Rules

Process discovery aims to learn process models from observed behaviors, i.e., event logs, in the information systems.The discovered models serve as the starting point for process mining techniques that are used to address performance and compliance problems. Compared to the state-of-the-art Inductive Miner, the algorithm applying synthesis rules from the free-choice net theory discovers process models with more flexible (non-block) structures while ensuring the same desirable soundness and free-choiceness properties. Moreover, recent development in this line of work shows that the discovered models have compatible quality. Following the synthesis rules, the algorithm incrementally modifies an existing process model by adding the activities in the event log one at a time. As the applications of rules are highly dependent on the existing model structure, the model quality and computation time are significantly influenced by the order of adding activities. In this paper, we investigate the effect of different ordering strategies on the discovered models (w.r.t. fitness and precision) and the computation time using real-life event data. The results show that the proposed ordering strategy can improve the quality of the resulting process models while requiring less time compared to the ordering strategy solely based on the frequency of activities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Discovering Sound Free-choice Workflow Nets With Non-block Structures

Process discovery aims to discover models that can explain the behaviors of event logs extracted from information systems. While various approaches have been proposed, only a few guarantee desirable properties such as soundness and free-choice. State-of-the-art approaches that exploit the representational bias of process trees to provide the guarantees are constrained to be block-structured.Such constructs limit the expressive power of the discovered models, i.e., only a subset of sound free-choice workflow nets can be discovered. To support a more flexible structural representation, we aim to discover process models that provide the same guarantees but also allow for non-block structures. Inspired by existing works that utilize synthesis rules from the free-choice nets theory, we propose an automatic approach that incrementally adds activities to an existing process model with predefined patterns. Playing by the rules ensures that the resulting models are always sound and free-choice. Furthermore, the discovered models are not restricted to block structures and are thus more flexible. The approach has been implemented in Python and tested using various real-life event logs. The experiments show that our approach can indeed discover models with competitive quality and more flexible structures compared to the existing approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Counterfactual Explanations for Predictive Business Process Monitoring

Predictive business process monitoring increasingly leverages sophisticated prediction models. Although sophisticated models achieve consistently higher prediction accuracy than simple models, one major drawback is their lack of interpretability, which limits their adoption in practice. We thus see growing interest in explainable predictive business process monitoring, which aims to increase the interpretability of prediction models. Existing solutions focus on giving factual explanations.While factual explanations can be helpful, humans typically do not ask why a particular prediction was made, but rather why it was made instead of another prediction, i.e., humans are interested in counterfactual explanations. While research in explainable AI produced several promising techniques to generate counterfactual explanations, directly applying them to predictive process monitoring may deliver unrealistic explanations, because they ignore the underlying process constraints. We propose LORELEY, a counterfactual explanation technique for predictive process monitoring, which extends LORE, a recent explainable AI technique. We impose control flow constraints to the explanation generation process to ensure realistic counterfactual explanations. Moreover, we extend LORE to enable explaining multi-class classification models. Experimental results using a real, public dataset indicate that LORELEY can approximate the prediction models with an average fidelity of 97.69\% and generate realistic counterfactual explanations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access