BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Trevor Brown

Trevor Brown contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Distributionally Linearizable Data Structures

Relaxed concurrent data structures have become increasingly popular, due to their scalability in graph processing and machine learning applications. Despite considerable interest, there exist families of natural, high performing randomized relaxed concurrent data structures, such as the popular MultiQueue pattern for implementing relaxed priority queue data structures, for which no guarantees are known in the concurrent setting. Our main contribution is in showing for the first time that, under a set of analytic assumptions, a family of relaxed concurrent data structures, including variants of MultiQueues, but also a new approximate counting algorithm we call the MultiCounter, provides strong probabilistic guarantees on the degree of relaxation with respect to the sequential specification, in arbitrary concurrent executions. We formalize these guarantees via a new correctness condition called distributional linearizability, tailored to concurrent implementations with randomized relaxations. Our result is based on a new analysis of an asynchronous variant of the classic power-of-two-choices load balancing algorithm, in which placement choices can be based on inconsistent, outdated information (this result may be of independent interest). We validate our results empirically, showing that the MultiCounter algorithm can implement scalable relaxed timestamps, which in turn can improve the performance of the classic TL2 transactional algorithm by up to 3 times, for some settings of parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Elimination (a,b)-trees with fast, durable updates

Many concurrent dictionary implementations are designed and optimized for read-mostly workloads with uniformly distributed keys, and often perform poorly on update-heavy workloads. In this work, we first present a concurrent (a,b)-tree, the OCC-ABtree, which outperforms its fastest competitor by up to 2x on uniform update-heavy workloads, and is competitive on other workloads. We then turn our attention to skewed update-heavy workloads (which feature many inserts/deletes on the same key) and introduce the Elim-ABtree, which uses a new optimization called publishing elimination. In publishing elimination, concurrent inserts and deletes to a key are reordered to eliminate them. This reduces the number of writes in the data structure. The Elim-ABtree achieves up to 2.5x the performance of its fastest competitor (including the OCC-ABtree). The OCC-ABtree and Elim-ABtree are linearizable. We also introduce durable linearizable versions (for systems with Intel Optane DCPMM non-volatile main memory) that are nearly as fast.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

NBR: Neutralization Based Reclamation

Safe memory reclamation (SMR) algorithms suffer from a trade-off between bounding unreclaimed memory and the speed of reclamation. Hazard pointer (HP) based algorithms bound unreclaimed memory at all times, but tend to be slower than other approaches. Epoch based reclamation (EBR) algorithms are faster, but do not bound memory reclamation. Other algorithms follow hybrid approaches, requiring special compiler or hardware support, changes to record layouts, and/or extensive code changes. Not all SMR algorithms can be used to reclaim memory for all data structures. We propose a new neutralization based reclamation (NBR) algorithm that is faster than the best known EBR algorithms and achieves bounded unreclaimed memory. It is non-blocking when used with a non-blocking operating system (OS) kernel, and only requires atomic read, write and CAS. NBR is straightforward to use with many different data structures, and in most cases, require similar reasoning and programmer effort to two-phased locking. NBR is implemented using OS signals and a lightweight handshaking mechanism between participating threads to determine when it is safe to reclaim a record. Experiments on a lock-based binary search tree and a lazy linked list show that NBR significantly outperforms many state of the art reclamation algorithms. In the tree NBR is faster than next best algorithm, DEBRA by upto 38% and HP by upto 17%. And, in the list NBR is 15% and 243% faster than DEBRA and HP, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Analysis and Evaluation of Non-Blocking Interpolation Search Trees

We start by summarizing the recently proposed implementation of the first non-blocking concurrent interpolation search tree (C-IST) data structure. We then analyze the individual operations of the C-IST, and show that they are correct and linearizable. We furthermore show that lookup (and several other non-destructive operations) are wait-free, and that the insert and delete operations are lock-free. We continue by showing that the C-IST has the following properties. For arbitrary key distributions, this data structure ensures worst-case $O(\log n + p)$ amortized time for search, insertion and deletion traversals. When the input key distributions are smooth, lookups run in expected $O(\log \log n + p)$ time, and insertion and deletion run in expected amortized $O(\log \log n + p)$ time, where $p$ is a bound on the number of threads. Finally, we present an extended experimental evaluation of the non-blocking IST performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access