Researcher profile

Toru Shiozaki

Toru Shiozaki contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Novel algorithms and high-performance cloud computing enable efficient fully quantum mechanical protein-ligand scoring

Ranking the binding of small molecules to protein receptors through physics-based computation remains challenging. Though inroads have been made using free energy methods, these fail when the underlying classical mechanical force fields are insufficient. In principle, a more accurate approach is provided by quantum mechanical density functional theory (DFT) scoring, but even with approximations, this has yet to become practical on drug discovery-relevant timescales and resources. Here, we describe how to overcome this barrier using algorithms for DFT calculations that scale on widely available cloud architectures, enabling full density functional theory, without approximations, to be applied to protein-ligand complexes with approximately 2500 atoms in tens of minutes. Applying this to a realistic example of 22 ligands binding to MCL1 reveals that density functional scoring outperforms classical free energy perturbation theory for this system. This raises the possibility of broadly applying fully quantum mechanical scoring to real-world drug discovery pipelines.

preprint2019arXiv

Efficient and Stochastic Multireference Perturbation Theory for Large Active Spaces within a Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo Framework

Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo (FCIQMC) has been effectively applied to very large configuration interaction (CI) problems, and was recently adapted for use as an active space solver and combined with orbital optimisation. In this work, we detail an approach within FCIQMC to allow for efficient sampling of fully internally-contracted multireference perturbation theories within the same stochastic framework. Schemes are described to allow for the close control over the resolution of stochastic sampling of the effective higher-body intermediates within the active space. It is found that while CASPT2 seems less amenable to a stochastic reformulation, NEVPT2 is far more stable, requiring a similar number of walkers to converge the NEVPT2 expectation values as to converge the underlying CI problem. We demonstrate the application of the stochastic approach to the computation of NEVPT2 within a (24,24) active space in a biologically relevant system, and show that small numbers of walkers are sufficient for a faithful sampling of the NEVPT2 energy to chemical accuracy, despite the active space already exceeding the limits of practicality for traditional approaches. This raises prospects of an efficient stochastic solver for multireference chemical problems requiring large active spaces, with an accurate treatment of external orbitals.

preprint2018arXiv

On the difference between variational and unitary coupled cluster theories

There have been assertions in the literature that the variational and unitary forms of coupled cluster theory lead to the same energy functional. Numerical evidence from previous authors was inconsistent with this claim, yet the small energy differences found between the two methods and the relatively large number of variational parameters precluded an unequivocal conclusion. Using the Lipkin Hamiltonian, we here present conclusive numerical evidence that the two theories yield different energies. The ambiguities arising from the size of the cluster parameter space are absent in the Lipkin model, particularly when truncating to double excitations. We show that in the symmetry adapted basis under strong correlation the differences between the variational and unitary models are large, whereas they yield quite similar energies in the weakly correlated regime previously explored. We also provide a qualitative argument rationalizing why these two models cannot be the same. Additionally, we study a generalized non-unitary and non-hermitian variant that contains excitation, de-excitation and mixed operators with different amplitudes and show that it works best when compared to the traditional, variational, unitary, and extended forms of coupled cluster doubles theories.