Researcher profile

Tony Pipe

Tony Pipe contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Integrating Formal Verification and Simulation-based Assertion Checking in a Corroborative V&V Process

Automated Vehicles (AVs) are rapidly maturing in the transportation domain. However, the complexity of the AV design problem is such that no single technique is sufficient to provide adequate validation of key properties such as safety, reliability or trustworthiness. In this vision paper, a combination of a spatial traffic logic and agent-based verification methods with a validation method that uses assertion checking of simulations is proposed. We sketch how to integrate the respective approaches within a methodological framework called Corroborative Verification and Validation (V&V).The Corroborative V&V framework identifies three different verification and validation levels for AVs (formal verification, simulation-based testing, real-world experiments) and specifies connections and evidence between these levels. We define specifications for the formal relationships that must be established between processes, system models and requirements models for the evidence from formal design verification and simulation-based testing to corroborate each other and enhance assurance confidence from verification and validation.

preprint2022arXiv

Safety Validation of Autonomous Vehicles using Assertion Checking

Safety and mission performance validation of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is a major challenge. In this paper we describe a methodology for constructing and applying assertion checks to validate the behaviour of an AV operating either in simulation or in the real world. We have identified a taxonomy of assertion types and the general format of their specification, and we have developed procedures for translating driving codes of practice to yield formal logical expressions that can be monitored automatically by computer, either by direct translation or by physical modelling. We have developed examples of assertions derived from the UK Highway Code (UKHC), as an example of a code of practice. We illustrate the approach with an example of assertion checking for vehicle overtaking, using a geospatial information system in an SQL database for validation and performance assessment. We present initial simulation and runtime monitoring experiments that apply assertions relevant in this overtaking scenario together with an analysis of the safety and mission performance characteristics measured.

preprint2020arXiv

An Agency-Directed Approach to Test Generation for Simulation-based Autonomous Vehicle Verification

Simulation-based verification is beneficial for assessing otherwise dangerous or costly on-road testing of autonomous vehicles (AV). This paper addresses the challenge of efficiently generating effective tests for simulation-based AV verification using software testing agents. The multi-agent system (MAS) programming paradigm offers rational agency, causality and strategic planning between multiple agents. We exploit these aspects for test generation, focusing in particular on the generation of tests that trigger the precondition of an assertion. On the example of a key assertion we show that, by encoding a variety of different behaviours respondent to the agent's perceptions of the test environment, the agency-directed approach generates twice as many effective tests than pseudo-random test generation, while being both efficient and robust. Moreover, agents can be encoded to behave naturally without compromising the effectiveness of test generation. Our results suggest that generating tests using agency-directed testing significantly improves upon random and simultaneously provides more realistic driving scenarios.