Researcher profile

Tony L. Perkins

Tony L. Perkins contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Green functions, the fine topology and restoring coverings

There are several equivalent ways to define continuous harmonic functions $H(K)$ on a compact set $K$ in $\mathbb R^n$. One may let $H(K)$ be the unform closures of all functions in $C(K)$ which are restrictions of harmonic functions on a neighborhood of $K$, or take $H(K)$ as the subspace of $C(K)$ consisting of functions which are finely harmonic on the fine interior of $K$. In \cite{DG74} it was shown that these definitions are equivalent. Using a localization result of \cite{BH78} one sees that a function $h\in H(K)$ if and only if it is continuous and finely harmonic on on every fine connected component of the fine interior of $K$. Such collection of sets are usually called {\it restoring}. Another equivalent definition of $H(K)$ was introduced in \cite{P97} using the notion of Jensen measures which leads another restoring collection of sets. The main goal of this paper is to reconcile the results in \cite{DG74} and \cite{P97}. To study these spaces, two notions of Green functions have previously been introduced. One by \cite{P97} as the limit of Green functions on domains $D_j$ where the domains $D_j$ are decreasing to $K$, and alternatively following \cite{F72, F75} one has the fine Green function on the fine interior of $K$. Our Theorem \ref{T:green_equiv} shows that these are equivalent notions. In Section \ref{S:Jensen} a careful study of the set of Jensen measures on $K$, leads to an interesting extension result (Corollary \ref{C:extend}) for superharmonic functions. This has a number of applications. In particular we show that the two restoring coverings are the same. We are also able to extend some results of \cite{GL83} and \cite{P97} to higher dimensions.