Source author record

Tom Friedetzky

Tom Friedetzky appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Data Structures and Algorithms math.CO math.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Time-space Trade-offs in Population Protocols for the Majority Problem

Population protocols are a model for distributed computing that is focused on simplicity and robustness. A system of $n$ identical agents (finite state machines) performs a global task like electing a unique leader or determining the majority opinion when each agent has one of two opinions. Agents communicate in pairwise interactions with randomly assigned communication partners. Quality is measured in two ways: the number of interactions to complete the task and the number of states per agent. We present protocols for the majority problem that allow for a trade-off between these two measures. Compared to the only other trade-off result [Alistarh, Gelashvili, Vojnovic; PODC'15], we improve the number of interactions by almost a linear factor. Furthermore, our protocols can be made uniform (working correctly without any information on the population size $n$), yielding the first uniform majority protocols that stabilize in a subquadratic number of interactions.

preprint2016arXiv

Plurality Consensus via Shuffling: Lessons Learned from Load Balancing

We consider \emph{plurality consensus} in a network of $n$ nodes. Initially, each node has one of $k$ opinions. The nodes execute a (randomized) distributed protocol to agree on the plurality opinion (the opinion initially supported by the most nodes). Nodes in such networks are often quite cheap and simple, and hence one seeks protocols that are not only fast but also simple and space efficient. Typically, protocols depend heavily on the employed communication mechanism, which ranges from sequential (only one pair of nodes communicates at any time) to fully parallel (all nodes communicate with all their neighbors at once) communication and everything in-between. We propose a framework to design protocols for a multitude of communication mechanisms. We introduce protocols that solve the plurality consensus problem and are with probability 1-o(1) both time and space efficient. Our protocols are based on an interesting relationship between plurality consensus and distributed load balancing. This relationship allows us to design protocols that generalize the state of the art for a large range of problem parameters. In particular, we obtain the same bounds as the recent result of Alistarh et al. (who consider only two opinions on a clique) using a much simpler protocol that generalizes naturally to general graphs and multiple opinions.

preprint2016arXiv

Self-stabilizing Balls & Bins in Batches

A fundamental problem in distributed computing is the distribution of requests to a set of uniform servers without a centralized controller. Classically, such problems are modeled as static balls into bins processes, where $m$ balls (tasks) are to be distributed to $n$ bins (servers). In a seminal work, Azar et al. proposed the sequential strategy \greedy{d} for $n=m$. When thrown, a ball queries the load of $d$ random bins and is allocated to a least loaded of these. Azar et al. showed that $d=2$ yields an exponential improvement compared to $d=1$. Berenbrink et al. extended this to $m\gg n$, showing that the maximal load difference is independent of $m$ for $d=2$ (in contrast to $d=1$). We propose a new variant of an \emph{infinite} balls into bins process. Each round an expected number of $λn$ new balls arrive and are distributed (in parallel) to the bins. Each non-empty bin deletes one of its balls. This setting models a set of servers processing incoming requests, where clients can query a server's current load but receive no information about parallel requests. We study the \greedy{d} distribution scheme in this setting and show a strong self-stabilizing property: For \emph{any} arrival rate $λ=λ(n)<1$, the system load is time-invariant. Moreover, for \emph{any} (even super-exponential) round $t$, the maximum system load is (w.h.p.) $O(\frac{1}{1-λ}\cdot\log\frac{n}{1-λ})$ for $d=1$ and $O(\log\frac{n}{1-λ})$ for $d=2$. In particular, \greedy{2} has an exponentially smaller system load for high arrival rates.

preprint2012arXiv

Random walks which prefer unvisited edges. Exploring high girth even degree expanders in linear time

We consider a modified random walk which uses unvisited edges whenever possible, and makes a simple random walk otherwise. We call such a walk an edge-process. We assume there is a rule A, which tells the walk which unvisited edge to use whenever there is a choice. In the simplest case, A is a uniform random choice over unvisited edges incident with the current walk position. However we do not exclude arbitrary choices of rule A. For example, the rule could be determined on-line by an adversary, or could vary from vertex to vertex. For even degree expander graphs, of bounded maximum degree, we have the following result. Let G be an n vertex even degree expander graph, for which every vertex is in at least one vertex induced cycle of length L. Any edge-process on G has cover time (n+ (n log n)/L). This result is independent of the rule A used to select the order of the unvisited edges, which can be chosen on-line by an adversary. As an example, With high probability, random r-regular graphs, (r at least 4, even), are expanders for which L = Omega(log n). Thus, for almost all such graphs, the vertex cover time of the edge-process is Theta(n). This improves the vertex cover time of such graphs by a factor of log n, compared to the Omega(n log n) cover time of any weighted random walk.