BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tim W. Reid

Tim W. Reid contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisMachine LearningMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Statistical Properties of the Probabilistic Numeric Linear Solver BayesCG

We analyse the calibration of BayesCG under the Krylov prior, a probabilistic numeric extension of the Conjugate Gradient (CG) method for solving systems of linear equations with symmetric positive definite coefficient matrix. Calibration refers to the statistical quality of the posterior covariances produced by a solver. Since BayesCG is not calibrated in the strict existing notion, we propose instead two test statistics that are necessary but not sufficient for calibration: the Z-statistic and the new S-statistic. We show analytically and experimentally that under low-rank approximate Krylov posteriors, BayesCG exhibits desirable properties of a calibrated solver, is only slightly optimistic, and is computationally competitive with CG.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems

This paper presents a probabilistic perspective on iterative methods for approximating the solution $\mathbf{x}_* \in \mathbb{R}^d$ of a nonsingular linear system $\mathbf{A} \mathbf{x}_* = \mathbf{b}$. In the approach a standard iterative method on $\mathbb{R}^d$ is lifted to act on the space of probability distributions $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$. Classically, an iterative method produces a sequence $\mathbf{x}_m$ of approximations that converge to $\mathbf{x}_*$. The output of the iterative methods proposed in this paper is, instead, a sequence of probability distributions $μ_m \in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The distributional output both provides a "best guess" for $\mathbf{x}_*$, for example as the mean of $μ_m$, and also probabilistic uncertainty quantification for the value of $\mathbf{x}_*$ when it has not been exactly determined. Theoretical analysis is provided in the prototypical case of a stationary linear iterative method. In this setting we characterise both the rate of contraction of $μ_m$ to an atomic measure on $\mathbf{x}_*$ and the nature of the uncertainty quantification being provided. We conclude with an empirical illustration that highlights the insight into solution uncertainty that can be provided by probabilistic iterative methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access