Source author record

Thomas Beckers

Thomas Beckers appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

eess.SY Machine Learning Systems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Identify Then Project: Contrastive Learning of Latent Dynamics from Partial Observations with Port-Hamiltonian Structure

Identifying latent state representations and dynamics is essential when direct modeling in observation space is infeasible, particularly under partial and high-dimensional observations. In such settings, representation learning and physics-aware modeling are inherently coupled. We study this problem for latent port-Hamiltonian systems, a structured class encompassing both conservative and dissipative dynamics. We propose a two-stage identify-then-project framework. First, a contrastive teacher learns continuous-time latent dynamics from partial observations. Then, a student projects the identified teacher representation and dynamics onto a port-Hamiltonian submanifold via a learned affine chart, yielding a physically consistent realization. As a conceptual counterfactual, we also consider a single-stage variant that jointly learns latent identification and port-Hamiltonian structure, but find it to be less reliable, motivating the proposed two-stage teacher-student framework. We show theoretically that affine projection is the natural bridge between the affine gauge of contrastive latent identification and the port-Hamiltonian systems. Empirically, we demonstrate that the proposed two-stage approach preserves the teacher's dynamics while enforcing physical structure, and performs more reliably than the single-stage alternative, particularly in dissipative regimes and high-dimensional visual settings.

preprint2021arXiv

An Introduction to Gaussian Process Models

Within the past two decades, Gaussian process regression has been increasingly used for modeling dynamical systems due to some beneficial properties such as the bias variance trade-off and the strong connection to Bayesian mathematics. As data-driven method, a Gaussian process is a powerful tool for nonlinear function regression without the need of much prior knowledge. In contrast to most of the other techniques, Gaussian Process modeling provides not only a mean prediction but also a measure for the model fidelity. In this article, we give an introduction to Gaussian processes and its usage in regression tasks of dynamical systems. Try Gaussian process regression yourself: https://gpr.tbeckers.com

preprint2020arXiv

Localized active learning of Gaussian process state space models

The performance of learning-based control techniques crucially depends on how effectively the system is explored. While most exploration techniques aim to achieve a globally accurate model, such approaches are generally unsuited for systems with unbounded state spaces. Furthermore, a globally accurate model is not required to achieve good performance in many common control applications, e.g., local stabilization tasks. In this paper, we propose an active learning strategy for Gaussian process state space models that aims to obtain an accurate model on a bounded subset of the state-action space. Our approach aims to maximize the mutual information of the exploration trajectories with respect to a discretization of the region of interest. By employing model predictive control, the proposed technique integrates information collected during exploration and adaptively improves its exploration strategy. To enable computational tractability, we decouple the choice of most informative data points from the model predictive control optimization step. This yields two optimization problems that can be solved in parallel. We apply the proposed method to explore the state space of various dynamical systems and compare our approach to a commonly used entropy-based exploration strategy. In all experiments, our method yields a better model within the region of interest than the entropy-based method.