BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Thomas Bartz-Beielstein

Thomas Bartz-Beielstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Neural and Evolutionary ComputingApplicationsArtificial Intelligencecs.CYMachine Learningmath.OCMathematical Software

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

In a Nutshell -- The Sequential Parameter Optimization Toolbox

The performance of optimization algorithms relies crucially on their parameterizations. Finding good parameter settings is called algorithm tuning. The sequential parameter optimization (SPOT) package for R is a toolbox for tuning and understanding simulation and optimization algorithms. Model-based investigations are common approaches in simulation and optimization. Sequential parameter optimization has been developed, because there is a strong need for sound statistical analysis of simulation and optimization algorithms. SPOT includes methods for tuning based on classical regression and analysis of variance techniques; tree-based models such as CART and random forest; Gaussian process models (Kriging), and combinations of different meta-modeling approaches. Using a simple simulated annealing algorithm, we will demonstrate how optimization algorithms can be tuned using SPOT. The underling concepts of the SPOT approach are explained. This includes key techniques such as exploratory fitness landscape analysis and sensititvity analysis. Many examples illustrate how SPOT can be used for understanding the performance of algorithms and gaining insight into algorithm's behavior. Furthermore, we demonstrate how SPOT can be used as an optimizer and how a sophisticated ensemble approach is able to combine several meta models via stacking. This article exemplifies how SPOT can be used for automatic and interactive tuning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A new Taxonomy of Continuous Global Optimization Algorithms

Surrogate-based optimization, nature-inspired metaheuristics, and hybrid combinations have become state of the art in algorithm design for solving real-world optimization problems. Still, it is difficult for practitioners to get an overview that explains their advantages in comparison to a large number of available methods in the scope of optimization. Available taxonomies lack the embedding of current approaches in the larger context of this broad field. This article presents a taxonomy of the field, which explores and matches algorithm strategies by extracting similarities and differences in their search strategies. A particular focus lies on algorithms using surrogates, nature-inspired designs, and those created by design optimization. The extracted features of components or operators allow us to create a set of classification indicators to distinguish between a small number of classes. The features allow a deeper understanding of components of the search strategies and further indicate the close connections between the different algorithm designs. We present intuitive analogies to explain the basic principles of the search algorithms, particularly useful for novices in this research field. Furthermore, this taxonomy allows recommendations for the applicability of the corresponding algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Expected Improvement versus Predicted Value in Surrogate-Based Optimization

Surrogate-based optimization relies on so-called infill criteria (acquisition functions) to decide which point to evaluate next. When Kriging is used as the surrogate model of choice (also called Bayesian optimization), one of the most frequently chosen criteria is expected improvement. We argue that the popularity of expected improvement largely relies on its theoretical properties rather than empirically validated performance. Few results from the literature show evidence, that under certain conditions, expected improvement may perform worse than something as simple as the predicted value of the surrogate model. We benchmark both infill criteria in an extensive empirical study on the `BBOB' function set. This investigation includes a detailed study of the impact of problem dimensionality on algorithm performance. The results support the hypothesis that exploration loses importance with increasing problem dimensionality. A statistical analysis reveals that the purely exploitative search with the predicted value criterion performs better on most problems of five or higher dimensions. Possible reasons for these results are discussed. In addition, we give an in-depth guide for choosing the infill criteria based on prior knowledge about the problem at hand, its dimensionality, and the available budget.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimization of High-dimensional Simulation Models Using Synthetic Data

Simulation models are valuable tools for resource usage estimation and capacity planning. In many situations, reliable data is not available. We introduce the BuB simulator, which requires only the specification of plausible intervals for the simulation parameters. By performing a surrogate-model based optimization, improved simulation model parameters can be determined. Furthermore, a detailed statistical analysis can be performed, which allows deep insights into the most important model parameters and their interactions. This information can be used to screen the parameters that should be further investigated. To exemplify our approach, a capacity and resource planning task for a hospital was simulated and optimized. The study explicitly covers difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It can be shown, that even if only limited real-world data is available, the BuB simulator can be beneficially used to consider worst- and best-case scenarios. The BuB simulator can be extended in many ways, e.g., by adding further resources (personal protection equipment, staff, pharmaceuticals) or by specifying several cohorts (based on age, health status, etc.). Keywords: Synthetic data, discrete-event simulation, surrogate-model-based optimization, COVID-19, machine learning, artificial intelligence, hospital resource planning, prediction tool, capacity planning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Simulation of an Elevator Group Control Using Generative Adversarial Networks and Related AI Tools

Testing new, innovative technologies is a crucial task for safety and acceptance. But how can new systems be tested if no historical real-world data exist? Simulation provides an answer to this important question. Classical simulation tools such as event-based simulation are well accepted. But most of these established simulation models require the specification of many parameters. Furthermore, simulation runs, e.g., CFD simulations, are very time consuming. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are powerful tools for generating new data for a variety of tasks. Currently, their most frequent application domain is image generation. This article investigates the applicability of GANs for imitating simulations. We are comparing the simulation output of a technical system with the output of a GAN. To exemplify this approach, a well-known multi-car elevator system simulator was chosen. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach. It also discusses pitfalls and technical problems that occurred during the implementation. Although we were able to show that in principle, GANs can be used as substitutes for expensive simulation runs, we also show that they cannot be used "out of the box". Fine tuning is needed. We present a proof-of-concept, which can serve as a starting point for further research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access