Source author record

Thomas Asklund

Thomas Asklund appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Whole-brain substitute CT generation using Markov random field mixture models

Computed tomography (CT) equivalent information is needed for attenuation correction in PET imaging and for dose planning in radiotherapy. Prior work has shown that Gaussian mixture models can be used to generate a substitute CT (s-CT) image from a specific set of MRI modalities. This work introduces a more flexible class of mixture models for s-CT generation, that incorporates spatial dependency in the data through a Markov random field prior on the latent field of class memberships associated with a mixture model. Furthermore, the mixture distributions are extended from Gaussian to normal inverse Gaussian (NIG), allowing heavier tails and skewness. The amount of data needed to train a model for s-CT generation is of the order of 100 million voxels. The computational efficiency of the parameter estimation and prediction methods are hence paramount, especially when spatial dependency is included in the models. A stochastic Expectation Maximization (EM) gradient algorithm is proposed in order to tackle this challenge. The advantages of the spatial model and NIG distributions are evaluated with a cross-validation study based on data from 14 patients. The study show that the proposed model enhances the predictive quality of the s-CT images by reducing the mean absolute error with 17.9%. Also, the distribution of CT values conditioned on the MR images are better explained by the proposed model as evaluated using continuous ranked probability scores.