Researcher profile

Thomas A. Hope

Thomas A. Hope contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Physics-driven Deep Learning for PET/MRI

In this paper, we review physics- and data-driven reconstruction techniques for simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems, which have significant advantages for clinical imaging of cancer, neurological disorders, and heart disease. These reconstruction approaches utilize priors, either structural or statistical, together with a physics-based description of the PET system response. However, due to the nested representation of the forward problem, direct PET/MRI reconstruction is a nonlinear problem. We elucidate how a multi-faceted approach accommodates hybrid data- and physics-driven machine learning for reconstruction of 3D PET/MRI, summarizing important deep learning developments made in the last 5 years to address attenuation correction, scattering, low photon counts, and data consistency. We also describe how applications of these multi-modality approaches extend beyond PET/MRI to improving accuracy in radiation therapy planning. We conclude by discussing opportunities for extending the current state-of-the-art following the latest trends in physics- and deep learning-based computational imaging and next-generation detector hardware.

preprint2020arXiv

Bone Material Analogues for PET/MRI Phantoms

Purpose: To develop bone material analogues that can be used in construction of phantoms for simultaneous PET/MRI systems. Methods: Plaster was used as the basis for the bone material analogues tested in this study. It was mixed with varying concentrations of an iodinated CT contrast, a gadolinium-based MR contrast agent, and copper sulfate to modulate the attenuation properties and MRI properties (T1 and T2*). Attenuation was measured with CT and 68Ge transmission scans, and MRI properties were measured with quantitative ultrashort echo time pulse sequences. A proof-of-concept skull was created by plaster casting. Results: Undoped plaster has a 511 keV attenuation coefficient (~0.14 cm-1) similar to cortical bone (0.10-0.15 cm-1), but slightly longer T1 (~500 ms) and T2* (~1.2 ms) MR parameters compared to bone (T1 ~ 300 ms, T2* ~ 0.4 ms). Doping with the iodinated agent resulted in increased attenuation with minimal perturbation to the MR parameters. Doping with a gadolinium chelate greatly reduced T1 and T2*, resulting in extremely short T1 values when the target T2* values were reached, while the attenuation coefficient was unchanged. Doping with copper sulfate was more selective for T2* shortening and achieved comparable T1 and T2* values to bone (after 1 week of drying), while the attenuation coefficient was unchanged. Conclusions: Plaster doped with copper sulfate is a promising bone material analogue for a PET/MRI phantom, mimicking the MR properties (T1 and T2*) and 511 keV attenuation coefficient of human cortical bone.