Researcher profile

Theodoros Loutas

Theodoros Loutas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Physics-Informed Bayesian Learning of Electrohydrodynamic Polymer Jet Printing Dynamics

Calibration of highly dynamic multi-physics manufacturing processes such as electro-hydrodynamics-based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies (E-jet printing) is still performed by labor-intensive trial-and-error practices. These practices have hindered the broad adoption of these technologies, demanding a new paradigm of self-calibrating E-jet printing machines. To address this need, we developed GPJet, an end-to-end physics-informed Bayesian learning framework, and tested it on a virtual E-jet printing machine with in-process jet monitoring capabilities. GPJet consists of three modules: a) the Machine Vision module, b) the Physics-Based Modeling Module, and c) the Machine Learning (ML) module. We demonstrate that the Machine Vision module can extract high-fidelity jet features in real-time from video data using an automated parallelized computer vision workflow. In addition, we show that the Machine Vision module, combined with the Physics-based modeling module, can act as closed-loop sensory feedback to the Machine Learning module of high- and low-fidelity data. Powered by our data-centric approach, we demonstrate that the online ML planner can actively learn the jet process dynamics using video and physics with minimum experimental cost. GPJet brings us one step closer to realizing the vision of intelligent AM machines that can efficiently search complex process-structure-property landscapes and create optimized material solutions for a wide range of applications at a fraction of the cost and speed.

preprint2020arXiv

Mode I fracture toughness of asymmetric metal-composite adhesive joints

In this work, the mode I fracture toughness of dissimilar metal-composite adhesive joints is experimentally investigated using the double cantilever beam (DCB) test. The particular joint under study is resulted by the adhesive joining of a thin titanium sheet with a thin carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminate and is envisioned to be implemented in the hybrid laminar flow control system of future aircraft. Four different industrial technologies for the joining of the titanium and CFRP adherents are evaluated/compared; co-bonding with and without adhesive and secondary bonding using either thermoset or thermoplastic CFRP. The vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) technique is employed for the manufacturing of the panels. After manufacturing, the panels are cut into test specimens that, because they are too thin (approximately 2.4 mm thick), needed to be stiffened from both titanium and composite sides with two aluminum backing beams to ensure the non-yielding of the titanium during the subsequent DCB tests. Towards the determination of the fracture toughness of the joint from the experimental data, an analytical model recently developed by the authors, that considers the bending-extension coupling of both sub-laminates constituting the test specimen as well as the manufacturing-induced residual thermal stresses, is applied. For the four manufacturing options (MO) investigated, the load-displacement behaviors, failure patterns, and fracture toughness performances are presented and compared.