Source author record

Thais A. Silva Camacho

Thais A. Silva Camacho appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Fast and Low-cost Search for Efficient Cloud Configurations for HPC Workloads

The use of cloud computational resources has become increasingly important for companies and researchers to access on-demand and at any moment high-performance resources. However, given the wide variety of virtual machine types, network configurations, number of instances, among others, finding the best configuration that reduces costs and resource waste while achieving acceptable performance is a hard task even for specialists. Thus, many approaches to find these good or optimal configurations for a given program have been proposed. Observing the performance of an application in some configuration takes time and money. Therefore, most of the approaches aim not only to find good solutions but also to reduce the search cost. One approach is the use of Bayesian Optimization to observe the least amount possible of configurations, reducing the search cost while still finding good solutions. Another approach is the use of a technique named Paramount Iteration to make performance assumptions of HPC workloads without entirely executing them (early-stopping), reducing the cost of making one observation, and making it feasible to grid search solutions. In this work, we show that both techniques can be used together to do fewer and low-cost observations. We show that such an approach can recommend Pareto-optimal solutions that are on average 1.68x better than Random Searching and with a 6-time cheaper search.