Source author record

Tejas Prashanth

Tejas Prashanth appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

LALR: Theoretical and Experimental validation of Lipschitz Adaptive Learning Rate in Regression and Neural Networks

We propose a theoretical framework for an adaptive learning rate policy for the Mean Absolute Error loss function and Quantile loss function and evaluate its effectiveness for regression tasks. The framework is based on the theory of Lipschitz continuity, specifically utilizing the relationship between learning rate and Lipschitz constant of the loss function. Based on experimentation, we have found that the adaptive learning rate policy enables up to 20x faster convergence compared to a constant learning rate policy.

preprint2020arXiv

LipschitzLR: Using theoretically computed adaptive learning rates for fast convergence

Optimizing deep neural networks is largely thought to be an empirical process, requiring manual tuning of several hyper-parameters, such as learning rate, weight decay, and dropout rate. Arguably, the learning rate is the most important of these to tune, and this has gained more attention in recent works. In this paper, we propose a novel method to compute the learning rate for training deep neural networks with stochastic gradient descent. We first derive a theoretical framework to compute learning rates dynamically based on the Lipschitz constant of the loss function. We then extend this framework to other commonly used optimization algorithms, such as gradient descent with momentum and Adam. We run an extensive set of experiments that demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on popular architectures and datasets, and show that commonly used learning rates are an order of magnitude smaller than the ideal value.