BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tejas Bhojraj

Tejas Bhojraj contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-phInformation TheoryLogic in Computer Sciencemath.ITMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Quantum algorithmic randomness

Quantum Martin-Löf randomness (q-MLR) for infinite qubit sequences was introduced by Nies and Scholz. We define a notion of quantum Solovay randomness which is equivalent to q-MLR. The proof of this goes through a purely linear algebraic result about approximating density matrices by subspaces. We then show that random states form a convex set. Martin-Löf absolute continuity is shown to be a special case of q-MLR. Quantum Schnorr randomness is introduced. A quantum analogue of the law of large numbers is shown to hold for quantum Schnorr random states.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generating Randomness from a Computable, Non-random Sequence of Qubits

Nies and Scholz introduced the notion of a state to describe an infinite sequence of qubits and defined quantum-Martin-Lof randomness for states, analogously to the well known concept of Martin-Löf randomness for elements of Cantor space (the space of infinite sequences of bits). We formalize how 'measurement' of a state in a basis induces a probability measure on Cantor space. A state is 'measurement random' (mR) if the measure induced by it, under any computable basis, assigns probability one to the set of Martin-Löf randoms. Equivalently, a state is mR if and only if measuring it in any computable basis yields a Martin-Löf random with probability one. While quantum-Martin-Löf random states are mR, the converse fails: there is a mR state, x which is not quantum-Martin-Löf random. In fact, something stronger is true. While x is computable and can be easily constructed, measuring it in any computable basis yields an arithmetically random sequence with probability one. I.e., classical arithmetic randomness can be generated from a computable, non-quantum random sequence of qubits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Global Optimum Search in Quantum Deep Learning

This paper aims to solve machine learning optimization problem by using quantum circuit. Two approaches, namely the average approach and the Partial Swap Test Cut-off method (PSTC) was proposed to search for the global minimum/maximum of two different objective functions. The current cost is $O(\sqrt{|Θ|} N)$, but there is potential to improve PSTC further to $O(\sqrt{|Θ|} \cdot sublinear \ N)$ by enhancing the checking process.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access