BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Taranveer Singh

Taranveer Singh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageMachine LearningNeural and Evolutionary Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

DeliberationBench: When Do More Voices Hurt? A Controlled Study of Multi-LLM Deliberation Protocols

Multi-agent systems where Large Language Models (LLMs) deliberate to form consensus have gained significant attention, yet their practical value over simpler methods remains under-scrutinized. We introduce DELIBERATIONBENCH, a controlled benchmark evaluating three deliberation protocols against a strong baseline of selecting the best response from a pool of model outputs. Across 270 questions and three independent seeds (810 total evaluations), we find a striking negative result: the best-single baseline achieves an 82.5% +- 3.3% win rate, dramatically outperforming the best deliberation protocol(13.8% +- 2.6%). This 6.0x performance gap is statistically significant (p < 0.01) and comes at 1.5-2.5x higher computational cost. Our findings challenge assumptions that complexity enhances quality in multi-LLM systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Systematically designing better instance counting models on cell images with Neural Arithmetic Logic Units

The big problem for neural network models which are trained to count instances is that whenever test range goes high training range generalization error increases i.e. they are not good generalizers outside training range. Consider the case of automating cell counting process where more dense images with higher cell counts are commonly encountered as compared to images used in training data. By making better predictions for higher ranges of cell count we are aiming to create better generalization systems for cell counting. With architecture proposal of neural arithmetic logic units (NALU) for arithmetic operations, task of counting has become feasible for higher numeric ranges which were not included in training data with better accuracy. As a part of our study we used these units and different other activation functions for learning cell counting task with two different architectures namely Fully Convolutional Regression Network and U-Net. These numerically biased units are added in the form of residual concatenated layers to original architectures and a comparative experimental study is done with these newly proposed changes. This comparative study is described in terms of optimizing regression loss problem from these models trained with extensive data augmentation techniques. We were able to achieve better results in our experiments of cell counting tasks with introduction of these numerically biased units to already existing architectures in the form of residual layer concatenation connections. Our results confirm that above stated numerically biased units does help models to learn numeric quantities for better generalization results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access