BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Taniya Seth

Taniya Seth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceDigital LibrariesMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Optimizing Hyperparameters in CNNs using Bilevel Programming in Time Series Data

Hyperparameter optimization has remained a central topic within the machine learning community due to its ability to produce state-of-the-art results. With the recent interest growing in the usage of CNNs for time series prediction, we propose the notion of optimizing Hyperparameters in CNNs for the purpose of time series prediction. In this position paper, we give away the idea of modeling the concerned hyperparameter optimization problem using bilevel programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Global Distribution of Google Scholar Citations: A Size-independent Institution-based Analysis

Most currently available schemes for performance based ranking of Universities or Research organizations, such as, Quacarelli Symonds (QS), Times Higher Education (THE), Shanghai University based All Research of World Universities (ARWU) use a variety of criteria that include productivity, citations, awards, reputation, etc., while Leiden and Scimago use only bibliometric indicators. The research performance evaluation in the aforesaid cases is based on bibliometric data from Web of Science or Scopus, which are commercially available priced databases. The coverage includes peer reviewed journals and conference proceedings. Google Scholar (GS) on the other hand, provides a free and open alternative to obtaining citations of papers available on the net, (though it is not clear exactly which journals are covered.) Citations are collected automatically from the net and also added to self created individual author profiles under Google Scholar Citations (GSC). This data was used by Webometrics Lab, Spain to create a ranked list of 4000+ institutions in 2016, based on citations from only the top 10 individual GSC profiles in each organization. (GSC excludes the top paper for reasons explained in the text; the simple selection procedure makes the ranked list size-independent as claimed by the Cybermetrics Lab). Using this data (Transparent Ranking TR, 2016), we find the regional and country wise distribution of GS-TR Citations. The size independent ranked list is subdivided into deciles of 400 institutions each and the number of institutions and citations of each country obtained for each decile. We test for correlation between institutional ranks between GS TR and the other ranking schemes for the top 20 institutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Type-2 Fuzzy Set based Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Linguistic Decision Making

Approaches based on computing with words find good applicability in decision making systems. Predominantly finding their basis in type-1 fuzzy sets, computing with words approaches employ type-1 fuzzy sets as semantics of the linguistic terms. However, type-2 fuzzy sets have been proven to be scientifically more appropriate to represent linguistic information in practical systems. They take into account both the intra-uncertainty as well as the inter-uncertainty in cases where the linguistic information comes from a group of experts. Hence in this paper, we propose to introduce linguistic terms whose semantics are denoted by interval type-2 fuzzy sets within the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set framework, resulting in type-2 fuzzy sets based hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. We also introduce a novel method of computing type-2 fuzzy envelopes out of multiple interval type-2 fuzzy sets with trapezoidal membership functions. Furthermore, the proposed framework with interval type-2 fuzzy sets is applied on a supplier performance evaluation scenario. Since humans are predominantly involved in the entire process of supply chain, their feedback is crucial while deciding many factors. Towards the end of the paper, we compare our presented model with various existing models and demonstrate the advantages of the former.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access