BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tandy Warnow

Tandy Warnow contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Digital Librariesphysics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Center-Periphery Structure in Communities: Extracellular Vesicles

Clustering and community detection in networks are of broad interest and have been the subject of extensive research that spans several fields. We are interested in the relatively narrow question of detecting communities of scientific publications that are linked by citations. These publication communities can be used to identify scientists with shared interests who form communities of researchers. Building on the well-known k-core algorithm, we have developed a modular pipeline to find publication communities. We compare our approach to communities discovered by the widely used Leiden algorithm for community finding. Using a quantitative and qualitative approach, we evaluate community finding results on a citation network consisting of over 14 million publications relevant to the field of extracellular vesicles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Finding Scientific Communities In Citation Graphs: Convergent Clustering

Understanding the nature and organization of scientific communities is of broad interest. The `Invisible College' is a historical metaphor for one such type of community and the search for such `colleges' can be framed as the detection and analysis of small groups of scientists working on problems of common interests. Case studies have previously been conducted on individual communities with respect to their scientific and social behavior. In this study, we introduce, a new and scalable community finding approach. Supplemented by expert assessment, we use the convergence of two different clustering methods to select article clusters generated from over two million articles from the field of immunology spanning an eleven year period with relevant cluster quality indicators for evaluation. Finally, we identify author communities defined by these clusters. A sample of the article clusters produced by this pipeline was reviewed by experts, and shows strong thematic relatedness, suggesting that the inferred author communities may represent valid communities of practice. These findings suggest that such convergent approaches may be useful in the future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Frequently Co-cited Publications: Features and Kinetics

Co-citation measurements can reveal the extent to which a concept representing a novel combination of existing ideas evolves towards a specialty. The strength of co-citation is represented by its frequency, which accumulates over time. Of interest is whether underlying features associated with the strength of co-citation can be identified. We use the proximal citation network for a given pair of articles (x, y) to compute theta, an a priori estimate of the probability of co-citation between x and y, prior to their first co-citation.Thus, low values for theta reflect pairs of articles for which co-citation is presumed less likely. We observe that co-citation frequencies are a composite of power-law and lognormal distributions, and that very high co-citation frequencies are more likely to be composed of pairs with low values of theta, reflecting the impact of a novel combination of ideas. Furthermore, we note that the occurrence of a direct citation between two members of a co-cited pair increases with co-citation frequency. Finally, we identify cases of frequently co-cited publications that accumulate co-citations after an extended period of dormancy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

NJst and ASTRID are not statistically consistent under a random model of missing data

Species tree estimation from multi-locus datasets is statistically challenging for multiple reasons, including gene tree heterogeneity across the genome due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Species tree estimation methods have been developed that operate by estimating gene trees and then using those gene trees to estimate the species tree. Several of these methods (e.g., ASTRAL, ASTRID, and NJst) are provably statistically consistent under the multi-species coalescent (MSC) model, provided that the gene trees are estimated correctly, and there is no missing data. Recently, Nute et al. (BMC Genomics 2018) addressed the question of whether these methods remain statistically consistent under random models of taxon deletion, and asserted that they do so. Here we provide a counterexample to one of these theorems, and establish that ASTRID and NJst are not statistically consistent under an i.i.d. model of taxon deletion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Co-citations in context: disciplinary heterogeneity is relevant

Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are cited, provides insight into how documents relate to each other and across fields. Co-citation analysis has been used to characterize combinations of prior work as conventional or innovative and to derive features of highly cited publications. Given the organization of science into disciplines, a key question is the sensitivity of such analyses to frame of reference. Our study examines this question using semantically-themed citation networks. We observe that trends reported to be true across the scientific literature do not hold for focused citation networks, and we conclude that inferring novelty using co-citation analysis and random graph models benefits from disciplinary context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Viewing Computer Science through Citation Analysis; Salton and Bergmark Redux

Computer science has experienced dramatic growth and diversification over the last twenty years. Towards a current understanding of the structure of this discipline, we analyze a cohort of the computer science literature using the DBLP database. For insight on the features of this cohort and the relationship within its components, we constructed article level clusters based on either direct citations or co-citations, and reconciled them to major and minor subject categories in the Scopus All Science Journal Classification (ASJC). We described complementary insights from clustering by direct citation and co-citation, and both point to the increase in computer science publications and their scope. Our analysis shows cross-category clusters, some that interact with external fields, such as the biological sciences, while others remain inward looking.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access