BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Tamir Tassa

Tamir Tassa appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Cryptography and SecurityDatabasesDiscrete MathematicsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingHuman-Computer Interaction

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fear Not, Vote Truthfully: Secure Multiparty Computation of Score Based Rules

We propose a secure voting protocol for score-based voting rules, where independent talliers perform the tallying procedure. The protocol outputs the winning candidate(s) while preserving the privacy of the voters and the secrecy of the ballots. It offers perfect secrecy, in the sense that apart from the desired output, all other information -- the ballots, intermediate values, and the final scores received by each of the candidates -- is not disclosed to any party, including the talliers. Such perfect secrecy may increase the voters' confidence and, consequently, encourage them to vote according to their true preferences. The protocol is extremely lightweight, and therefore it can be easily deployed in real-life voting scenarios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Injecting Uncertainty in Graphs for Identity Obfuscation

Data collected nowadays by social-networking applications create fascinating opportunities for building novel services, as well as expanding our understanding about social structures and their dynamics. Unfortunately, publishing social-network graphs is considered an ill-advised practice due to privacy concerns. To alleviate this problem, several anonymization methods have been proposed, aiming at reducing the risk of a privacy breach on the published data, while still allowing to analyze them and draw relevant conclusions. In this paper we introduce a new anonymization approach that is based on injecting uncertainty in social graphs and publishing the resulting uncertain graphs. While existing approaches obfuscate graph data by adding or removing edges entirely, we propose using a finer-grained perturbation that adds or removes edges partially: this way we can achieve the same desired level of obfuscation with smaller changes in the data, thus maintaining higher utility. Our experiments on real-world networks confirm that at the same level of identity obfuscation our method provides higher usefulness than existing randomized methods that publish standard graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Finding All Allowed Edges in a Bipartite Graph

We consider the problem of finding all allowed edges in a bipartite graph $G=(V,E)$, i.e., all edges that are included in some maximum matching. We show that given any maximum matching in the graph, it is possible to perform this computation in linear time $O(n+m)$ (where $n=|V|$ and $m=|E|$). Hence, the time complexity of finding all allowed edges reduces to that of finding a single maximum matching, which is $O(n^{1/2}m)$ [Hopcroft and Karp 1973], or $O((n/\log n)^{1/2}m)$ for dense graphs with $m=Θ(n^2)$ [Alt et al. 1991]. This time complexity improves upon that of the best known algorithms for the problem, which is $O(nm)$ ([Costa 1994] for bipartite graphs, and [Carvalho and Cheriyan 2005] for general graphs). Other algorithms for solving that problem are randomized algorithms due to [Rabin and Vazirani 1989] and [Cheriyan 1997], the runtime of which is $\tilde{O}(n^{2.376})$. Our algorithm, apart from being deterministic, improves upon that time complexity for bipartite graphs when $m=O(n^r)$ and $r<1.876$. In addition, our algorithm is elementary, conceptually simple, and easy to implement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Secure Mining of Association Rules in Horizontally Distributed Databases

We propose a protocol for secure mining of association rules in horizontally distributed databases. The current leading protocol is that of Kantarcioglu and Clifton (TKDE 2004). Our protocol, like theirs, is based on the Fast Distributed Mining (FDM) algorithm of Cheung et al. (PDIS 1996), which is an unsecured distributed version of the Apriori algorithm. The main ingredients in our protocol are two novel secure multi-party algorithms --- one that computes the union of private subsets that each of the interacting players hold, and another that tests the inclusion of an element held by one player in a subset held by another. Our protocol offers enhanced privacy with respect to the protocol of Kantarcioglu and Clifton. In addition, it is simpler and is significantly more efficient in terms of communication rounds, communication cost and computational cost.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access