BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Takashi Horiyama

Takashi Horiyama contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Geometrymath.COComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsSymbolic Computation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Computational Complexity of Swish

Swish is a card game in which players are given cards having symbols (hoops and balls), and find a valid superposition of cards, called a "swish." Dailly, Lafourcade, and Marcadet (FUN 2024) studied a generalized version of Swish and showed that the problem is solvable in polynomial time with one symbol per card, while it is NP-complete with three or more symbols per card. In this paper, we resolve the previously open case of two symbols per card, which corresponds to the original game. We show that Swish is NP-complete for this case. Specifically, we prove the NP-hardness when the allowed transformations of cards are restricted to a single (horizontal or vertical) flip or 180-degree rotation, and extend the results to the original setting allowing all three transformations. In contrast, when neither transformation is allowed, we present a polynomial-time algorithm. Combining known and our results, we establish a complete characterization of the computational complexity of Swish with respect to both the number of symbols per card and the allowed transformations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Segment Folding is Hard

We introduce a computational origami problem which we call the segment folding problem: given a set of $n$ line-segments in the plane the aim is to make creases along all segments in the minimum number of folding steps. Note that a folding might alter the relative position between the segments, and a segment could split into two. We show that it is NP-hard to determine whether $n$ line segments can be folded in $n$ simple folding operations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Interval-Memoized Backtracking on ZDDs for Fast Enumeration of All Lower Cost Solutions

In this paper, we propose a fast method for exactly enumerating a very large number of all lower cost solutions for various combinatorial problems. Our method is based on backtracking for a given decision diagram which represents all the feasible solutions. The main idea is to memoize the intervals of cost bounds to avoid duplicate search in the backtracking process. In contrast to usual pseudo-polynomial-time dynamic programming approaches, the computation time of our method does not directly depend on the total cost values, but is bounded by the input and output size of the decision diagrams. Therefore, it can be much faster if the cost values are large but the input/output decision diagrams are well-compressed. We demonstrate its practical efficiency by comparing our method to current available enumeration methods: for nontrivial size instances of the Hamiltonian path problem, our method succeeded in exactly enumerating billions of all lower cost solutions in a few seconds, which was hundred or much more times faster. Our method can be regarded as a novel search algorithm which integrates the two classical techniques, branch-and-bound and dynamic programming. This method would have many applications in various fields, including operations research, data mining, statistical testing, hardware/software system design, etc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

RePair Grammars are the Smallest Grammars for Fibonacci Words

Grammar-based compression is a loss-less data compression scheme that represents a given string $w$ by a context-free grammar that generates only $w$. While computing the smallest grammar which generates a given string $w$ is NP-hard in general, a number of polynomial-time grammar-based compressors which work well in practice have been proposed. RePair, proposed by Larsson and Moffat in 1999, is a grammar-based compressor which recursively replaces all possible occurrences of a most frequently occurring bigrams in the string. Since there can be multiple choices of the most frequent bigrams to replace, different implementations of RePair can result in different grammars. In this paper, we show that the smallest grammars generating the Fibonacci words $F_k$ can be completely characterized by RePair, where $F_k$ denotes the $k$-th Fibonacci word. Namely, all grammars for $F_k$ generated by any implementation of RePair are the smallest grammars for $F_k$, and no other grammars can be the smallest for $F_k$. To the best of our knowledge, Fibonacci words are the first non-trivial infinite family of strings for which RePair is optimal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compiling Crossing-free Geometric Graphs with Connectivity Constraint for Fast Enumeration, Random Sampling, and Optimization

Given $n$ points in the plane, we propose algorithms to compile connected crossing-free geometric graphs into directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). The DAGs allow efficient counting, enumeration, random sampling, and optimization. Our algorithms rely on Wettstein's framework to compile several crossing-free geometric graphs. One of the remarkable contributions of Wettstein is to allow dealing with geometric graphs with connectivity, since it is known to be difficult to efficiently represent geometric graphs with such global property. To achieve this, Wettstein proposed specialized techniques for crossing-free spanning trees and crossing-free spanning cycles and invented compiling algorithms running in $\mathrm{O}(7.044^n)$ time and $\mathrm{O}(5.619^n)$ time, respectively. Our first contribution is to propose a technique to deal with the connectivity constraint more simply and efficiently. It makes the design and analysis of algorithms easier, and yields improved time complexity. Our algorithms achieve $\mathrm{O}(6^n)$ time and $\mathrm{O}(4^n)$ time for compiling crossing-free spanning trees and crossing-free spanning cycles, respectively. As the second contribution, we propose an algorithm to optimize the area surrounded by crossing-free spanning cycles. To achieve this, we modify the DAG so that it has additional information. Our algorithm runs in $\mathrm{O}(4.829^n)$ time to find an area-minimized (or maximized) crossing-free spanning cycle of a given point set. Although the problem was shown to be NP-complete in 2000, as far as we know, there were no known algorithms faster than the obvious $\mathrm{O}(n!)$ time algorithm for 20 years.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access