Source author record

Jun Kawahara

Jun Kawahara appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Applications Computational Complexity Computational Geometry Cryptography and Security cs.CY math.CO Performance Symbolic Computation

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

9topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Computational Complexity of Swish

Swish is a card game in which players are given cards having symbols (hoops and balls), and find a valid superposition of cards, called a "swish." Dailly, Lafourcade, and Marcadet (FUN 2024) studied a generalized version of Swish and showed that the problem is solvable in polynomial time with one symbol per card, while it is NP-complete with three or more symbols per card. In this paper, we resolve the previously open case of two symbols per card, which corresponds to the original game. We show that Swish is NP-complete for this case. Specifically, we prove the NP-hardness when the allowed transformations of cards are restricted to a single (horizontal or vertical) flip or 180-degree rotation, and extend the results to the original setting allowing all three transformations. In contrast, when neither transformation is allowed, we present a polynomial-time algorithm. Combining known and our results, we establish a complete characterization of the computational complexity of Swish with respect to both the number of symbols per card and the allowed transformations.

preprint2022arXiv

Interval-Memoized Backtracking on ZDDs for Fast Enumeration of All Lower Cost Solutions

In this paper, we propose a fast method for exactly enumerating a very large number of all lower cost solutions for various combinatorial problems. Our method is based on backtracking for a given decision diagram which represents all the feasible solutions. The main idea is to memoize the intervals of cost bounds to avoid duplicate search in the backtracking process. In contrast to usual pseudo-polynomial-time dynamic programming approaches, the computation time of our method does not directly depend on the total cost values, but is bounded by the input and output size of the decision diagrams. Therefore, it can be much faster if the cost values are large but the input/output decision diagrams are well-compressed. We demonstrate its practical efficiency by comparing our method to current available enumeration methods: for nontrivial size instances of the Hamiltonian path problem, our method succeeded in exactly enumerating billions of all lower cost solutions in a few seconds, which was hundred or much more times faster. Our method can be regarded as a novel search algorithm which integrates the two classical techniques, branch-and-bound and dynamic programming. This method would have many applications in various fields, including operations research, data mining, statistical testing, hardware/software system design, etc.

preprint2020arXiv

The Essential Role of Empirical Validation in Legislative Redistricting Simulation

As granular data about elections and voters become available, redistricting simulation methods are playing an increasingly important role when legislatures adopt redistricting plans and courts determine their legality. These simulation methods are designed to yield a representative sample of all redistricting plans that satisfy statutory guidelines and requirements such as contiguity, population parity, and compactness. A proposed redistricting plan can be considered gerrymandered if it constitutes an outlier relative to this sample according to partisan fairness metrics. Despite their growing use, an insufficient effort has been made to empirically validate the accuracy of the simulation methods. We apply a recently developed computational method that can efficiently enumerate all possible redistricting plans and yield an independent uniform sample from this population. We show that this algorithm scales to a state with a couple of hundred geographical units. Finally, we empirically examine how existing simulation methods perform on realistic validation data sets.

preprint2017arXiv

Effect of Bitcoin fee on transaction-confirmation process

In Bitcoin system, transactions are prioritized according to transaction fees. Transactions without fees are given low priority and likely to wait for confirmation. Because the demand of micro payment in Bitcoin is expected to increase due to low remittance cost, it is important to quantitatively investigate how transactions with small fees of Bitcoin affect the transaction-confirmation time. In this paper, we analyze the transaction-confirmation time by queueing theory. We model the transaction-confirmation process of Bitcoin as a priority queueing system with batch service, deriving the mean transaction-confirmation time. Numerical examples show how the demand of transactions with low fees affects the transaction-confirmation time. We also consider the effect of the maximum block size on the transaction-confirmation time.

preprint2015arXiv

An improved lower bound for one-dimensional online unit clustering

The online unit clustering problem was proposed by Chan and Zarrabi-Zadeh (WAOA2007 and Theory of Computing Systems 45(3), 2009), which is defined as follows: "Points" are given online in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space one by one. An algorithm creates a "cluster," which is a $d$-dimensional rectangle. The initial length of each edge of a cluster is 0. An algorithm can extend an edge until it reaches unit length independently of other dimensions. The task of an algorithm is to cover a new given point either by creating a new cluster and assigning it to the point, or by extending edges of an existing cluster created in past times. The goal is to minimize the total number of created clusters. Chan and Zarrabi-Zadeh proposed some method to obtain a competitive algorithm for the $d$-dimensional case using an algorithm for the one-dimensional case, and thus the one-dimensional case has been extensively studied including some variants of the unit clustering problem. In this paper, we show a lower bound of $13/8 = 1.625$ on the competitive ratio of any deterministic online algorithm for the one-dimensional unit clustering, improving the previous lower bound $8/5 (=1.6)$ presented by Epstein and van Stee (WAOA2007 and ACM Transactions on Algorithms 7(1), 2010). Note that Ehmsen and Larsen (SWAT2010 and Theoretical Computer Science, 500, 2013) showed the current best upper bound of $5/3$, and conjectured that the exact competitive ratio in the one-dimensional case may be $13/8$.

preprint2014arXiv

Tight Analysis of Priority Queuing Policy for Egress Traffic

Recently, the problems of evaluating performances of switches and routers have been formulated as online problems, and a great amount of results have been presented. In this paper, we focus on managing outgoing packets (called {\em egress traffic}) on switches that support Quality of Service (QoS), and analyze the performance of one of the most fundamental scheduling policies {\em Priority Queuing} ($PQ$) using competitive analysis. We formulate the problem of managing egress queues as follows: An output interface is equipped with $m$ queues, each of which has a buffer of size $B$. The size of a packet is unit, and each buffer can store up to $B$ packets simultaneously. Each packet is associated with one of $m$ priority values $α_{j}$ ($1 \leq j \leq m$), where $α_{1} \leq α_{2} \leq \cdots \leq α_{m}$, $α_{1} = 1$, and $α_{m} = α$ and the task of an online algorithm is to select one of $m$ queues at each scheduling step. The purpose of this problem is to maximize the sum of the values of the scheduled packets. For any $B$ and any $m$, we show that the competitive ratio of $PQ$ is exactly $2 - \min_{x \in [1, m-1] } \{ \frac{ α_{x+1} }{ \sum_{j = 1}^{x+1} α_{j} } \}$. That is, we conduct a complete analysis of the performance of $PQ$ using worst case analysis. Moreover, we show that no deterministic online algorithm can have a competitive ratio smaller than $1 + \frac{ α^3 + α^2 + α}{ α^4 + 4 α^3 + 3 α^2 + 4 α+ 1 }$.

preprint2013arXiv

Better Bounds for Online $k$-Frame Throughput Maximization in Network Switches

We consider a variant of the online buffer management problem in network switches, called the $k$-frame throughput maximization problem ($k$-FTM). This problem models the situation where a large frame is fragmented into $k$ packets and transmitted through the Internet, and the receiver can reconstruct the frame only if he/she accepts all the $k$ packets. Kesselman et al.\ introduced this problem and showed that its competitive ratio is unbounded even when $k=2$. They also introduced an "order-respecting" variant of $k$-FTM, called $k$-OFTM, where inputs are restricted in some natural way. They proposed an online algorithm and showed that its competitive ratio is at most $\frac{2kB}{\lfloor B/k \rfloor} + k$ for any $B \ge k$, where $B$ is the size of the buffer. They also gave a lower bound of $\frac{B}{\lfloor 2B/k \rfloor}$ for deterministic online algorithms when $2B \geq k$ and $k$ is a power of 2. In this paper, we improve upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio of $k$-OFTM. Our main result is to improve an upper bound of $O(k^{2})$ by Kesselman et al.\ to $\frac{5B + \lfloor B/k \rfloor - 4}{\lfloor B/2k \rfloor} = O(k)$ for $B\geq 2k$. Note that this upper bound is tight up to a multiplicative constant factor since the lower bound given by Kesselman et al.\ is $Ω(k)$. We also give two lower bounds. First we give a lower bound of $\frac{2B}{\lfloor {B/(k-1)} \rfloor} + 1$ on the competitive ratio of deterministic online algorithms for any $k \geq 2$ and any $B \geq k-1$, which improves the previous lower bound of $\frac{B}{\lfloor 2B/k \rfloor}$ by a factor of almost four. Next, we present the first nontrivial lower bound on the competitive ratio of randomized algorithms. Specifically, we give a lower bound of $k-1$ against an oblivious adversary for any $k \geq 3$ and any $B$.