BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Supratim Shit

Supratim Shit contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

COREKG: Coreset-Guided Personalized Summarization of Knowledge Graphs

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are extensively used across different domains and in several applications. Often, these KGs are very large in size. Such KGs become unwieldy for tasks such as question answering and visualization. Summarization of KGs offers a viable alternative in such cases. Furthermore, personalized KG summarization is crucial in the current data-driven world as it captures the specific requirements of users based on their query patterns. Since it only maintains relevant information, the personalized summaries of KG are small, resulting in significantly smaller storage requirements and query runtime. In this work, we adapt the coreset theory to create personalized KG summaries. For a given dataset and a user-specific query workload, we present an approach that samples a relevant subset of triples using sensitivity-based importance sampling. We ensure that the subset approximates the characteristics of the full dataset with bounded approximation error. We define sensitivity scores that measure the importance of a triple with respect to a user's query workload, which are then used by our coreset construction algorithm. We explicitly focus on personalized knowledge graph summarization by constructing summaries independently for each user based on their query behaviour. Our evaluation on Freebase, WikiData, and DBpedia shows that COREKG delivers higher query-answering accuracy and structural coverage than the state-of-the-art methods, such as GLIMPSE, PPR, iSummary, PEGASUS and APEX$^2$ while requiring only a tiny fraction of the original graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Coresets For Regularized Regression

We study the effect of norm based regularization on the size of coresets for regression problems. Specifically, given a matrix $ \mathbf{A} \in {\mathbb{R}}^{n \times d}$ with $n\gg d$ and a vector $\mathbf{b} \in \mathbb{R} ^ n $ and $λ> 0$, we analyze the size of coresets for regularized versions of regression of the form $\|\mathbf{Ax}-\mathbf{b}\|_p^r + λ\|{\mathbf{x}}\|_q^s$ . Prior work has shown that for ridge regression (where $p,q,r,s=2$) we can obtain a coreset that is smaller than the coreset for the unregularized counterpart i.e. least squares regression (Avron et al). We show that when $r \neq s$, no coreset for regularized regression can have size smaller than the optimal coreset of the unregularized version. The well known lasso problem falls under this category and hence does not allow a coreset smaller than the one for least squares regression. We propose a modified version of the lasso problem and obtain for it a coreset of size smaller than the least square regression. We empirically show that the modified version of lasso also induces sparsity in solution, similar to the original lasso. We also obtain smaller coresets for $\ell_p$ regression with $\ell_p$ regularization. We extend our methods to multi response regularized regression. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the coreset performance for the modified lasso and the $\ell_1$ regression with $\ell_1$ regularization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Streaming Coresets for Symmetric Tensor Factorization

Factorizing tensors has recently become an important optimization module in a number of machine learning pipelines, especially in latent variable models. We show how to do this efficiently in the streaming setting. Given a set of $n$ vectors, each in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we present algorithms to select a sublinear number of these vectors as coreset, while guaranteeing that the CP decomposition of the $p$-moment tensor of the coreset approximates the corresponding decomposition of the $p$-moment tensor computed from the full data. We introduce two novel algorithmic techniques: online filtering and kernelization. Using these two, we present six algorithms that achieve different tradeoffs of coreset size, update time and working space, beating or matching various state of the art algorithms. In the case of matrices ($2$-ordered tensor), our online row sampling algorithm guarantees $(1 \pm ε)$ relative error spectral approximation. We show applications of our algorithms in learning single topic modeling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access