Researcher profile

Subir Kumar Bhandari

Subir Kumar Bhandari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Asymptotic bayes optimality under sparsity for equicorrelated multivariate normal test statistics

Here we address dependence among the test statistics in connection with asymptotically Bayes' optimal tests in presence of sparse alternatives. Extending the setup in Bogdan et.al. (2011) we consider an equicorrelated ( with equal correlation $ρ$ ) multivariate normal assumption on the joint distribution of the test statistics, while conditioned on the mean vector $\boldsymbolμ$. Rest of the set up is identical to Bogdan et.al. (2011) with a slight modification in the asymptotic framework. We exploit an well known result on equicorrelated multivariate normal variables with equal marginal variances to decompose the test statistics into independent random variables. We then identify a set of independent yet unobservable gaussian random variables sufficient for the multiple testing problem and chalk out the necessary and sufficient conditions for single cutoff tests to be ABOS based on those dummy variables following Bogdan et.al. (2011). Further we replaced the dummy variables with deviations of the statistics from their arithmetic means which were easily calculable from the observations due to the decomposition used earlier. Additional assumptions are then derived so that the necessary and sufficient conditions for single cutoff tests to be ABOS using the independent dummy variables plays the same role with the replacement variable as well (with a deviation of order $o(1)$). Next with the same additional assumption, necessary and sufficient conditions for single cutoff tests to control the Bayesian FDRs are derived and as a consequence under various sparsity assumptions we proved that the classical Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg methods of multiple testing are ABOS if the same conditions are satisfied.

preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotically optimal test for dependent multiple testing set up

In this paper we explore the behaviour of dependent test statistics for testing of multiple hypothesis . To keep simplicity, we have considered a mixture normal model with equicorrelated correlation set up. With a simple linear transformation,the test statistics were decomposed into independent components, which, when conditioned appropriately generated independent variables. These were used to construct conditional tests , which were shown to be asymptotically optimal with power as large as that obtained using N.P.Lemma. We have pursued extensive simulation to support the claim.

preprint2020arXiv

Observation on F.W.E.R. and F.D.R. for correlated normal

In this paper, we have attempted to study the behaviour of the family wise error rate (FWER) for Bonferroni's procedure and false discovery rate (FDR) of the Benjamini-Hodgeberg procedure for simultaneous testing problem with equicorrelated normal observations. By simulation study, we have shown that F.W.E.R. is a concave function for small no. of hypotheses and asymptotically becomes a convex function of the correlation. The plots of F.W.E.R. and F.D.R. confirms that if non-negative correlation is present, then these procedures control the type-I error rate at a much smaller rate than the desired level of significance. This confirms the conservative nature of these popular methods when correlation is present and provides a scope for improvement in power by appropriate adjustment for correlation.