BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stratos Idreos

Stratos Idreos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
DatabasesMachine LearningData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Proteus: A Self-Designing Range Filter

We introduce Proteus, a novel self-designing approximate range filter, which configures itself based on sampled data in order to optimize its false positive rate (FPR) for a given space requirement. Proteus unifies the probabilistic and deterministic design spaces of state-of-the-art range filters to achieve robust performance across a larger variety of use cases. At the core of Proteus lies our Contextual Prefix FPR (CPFPR) model - a formal framework for the FPR of prefix-based filters across their design spaces. We empirically demonstrate the accuracy of our model and Proteus' ability to optimize over both synthetic workloads and real-world datasets. We further evaluate Proteus in RocksDB and show that it is able to improve end-to-end performance by as much as 5.3x over more brittle state-of-the-art methods such as SuRF and Rosetta. Our experiments also indicate that the cost of modeling is not significant compared to the end-to-end performance gains and that Proteus is robust to workload shifts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Real-Time LSM-Trees for HTAP Workloads

Real-time analytics systems employ hybrid data layouts in which data are stored in different formats throughout their lifecycle. Recent data are stored in a row-oriented format to serve OLTP workloads and support high insert rates, while older data are transformed to a column-oriented format for OLAP access patterns. We observe that a Log-Structured Merge (LSM) Tree is a natural fit for a lifecycle-aware storage engine due to its high write throughput and level-oriented structure, in which records propagate from one level to the next over time. To build a lifecycle-aware storage engine using an LSM-Tree, we make a crucial modification to allow different data layouts in different levels, ranging from purely row-oriented to purely column-oriented, leading to a Real-Time LSM-Tree. We give a cost model and an algorithm to design a Real-Time LSM-Tree that is suitable for a given workload, followed by an experimental evaluation of LASER - a prototype implementation of our idea built on top of the RocksDB key-value store.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Case for Distributed Shared-Memory Databases with RDMA-Enabled Memory Disaggregation

Memory disaggregation (MD) allows for scalable and elastic data center design by separating compute (CPU) from memory. With MD, compute and memory are no longer coupled into the same server box. Instead, they are connected to each other via ultra-fast networking such as RDMA. MD can bring many advantages, e.g., higher memory utilization, better independent scaling (of compute and memory), and lower cost of ownership. This paper makes the case that MD can fuel the next wave of innovation on database systems. We observe that MD revives the great debate of "shared what" in the database community. We envision that distributed shared-memory databases (DSM-DB, for short) - that have not received much attention before - can be promising in the future with MD. We present a list of challenges and opportunities that can inspire next steps in system design making the case for DSM-DB.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

MotherNets: Rapid Deep Ensemble Learning

Ensembles of deep neural networks significantly improve generalization accuracy. However, training neural network ensembles requires a large amount of computational resources and time. State-of-the-art approaches either train all networks from scratch leading to prohibitive training cost that allows only very small ensemble sizes in practice, or generate ensembles by training a monolithic architecture, which results in lower model diversity and decreased prediction accuracy. We propose MotherNets to enable higher accuracy and practical training cost for large and diverse neural network ensembles: A MotherNet captures the structural similarity across some or all members of a deep neural network ensemble which allows us to share data movement and computation costs across these networks. We first train a single or a small set of MotherNets and, subsequently, we generate the target ensemble networks by transferring the function from the trained MotherNet(s). Then, we continue to train these ensemble networks, which now converge drastically faster compared to training from scratch. MotherNets handle ensembles with diverse architectures by clustering ensemble networks of similar architecture and training a separate MotherNet for every cluster. MotherNets also use clustering to control the accuracy vs. training cost tradeoff. We show that compared to state-of-the-art approaches such as Snapshot Ensembles, Knowledge Distillation, and TreeNets, MotherNets provide a new Pareto frontier for the accuracy-training cost tradeoff. Crucially, training cost and accuracy improvements continue to scale as we increase the ensemble size (2 to 3 percent reduced absolute test error rate and up to 35 percent faster training compared to Snapshot Ensembles). We verify these benefits over numerous neural network architectures and large data sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access