Researcher profile

Steven N. Karp

Steven N. Karp contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On two notions of total positivity for partial flag varieties

Given integers $1 \le k_1 < \cdots < k_l \le n-1$, let $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}$ denote the type $A$ partial flag variety consisting of all chains of subspaces $(V_{k_1}\subset\cdots\subset V_{k_l})$ inside $\mathbb{R}^n$, where each $V_k$ has dimension $k$. Lusztig (1994, 1998) introduced the totally positive part $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{>0}$ as the subset of partial flags which can be represented by a totally positive $n\times n$ matrix, and defined the totally nonnegative part $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{\ge 0}$ as the closure of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{>0}$. On the other hand, following Postnikov (2007), we define $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{Δ>0}$ and $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{Δ\ge 0}$ as the subsets of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}$ where all Plücker coordinates are positive and nonnegative, respectively. It follows from the definitions that Lusztig&#39;s total positivity implies Plücker positivity, and it is natural to ask when these two notions of positivity agree. Rietsch (2009) proved that they agree in the case of the Grassmannian $\text{Fl}_{k;n}$, and Chevalier (2011) showed that the two notions are distinct for $\text{Fl}_{1,3;4}$. We show that in general, the two notions agree if and only if $k_1, \dots, k_l$ are consecutive integers. We give an elementary proof of this result (including for the case of Grassmannians) based on classical results in linear algebra and the theory of total positivity. We also show that the cell decomposition of $\text{Fl}_{k_1,\dots,k_l;n}^{\ge 0}$ coincides with its matroid decomposition if and only if $k_1,\dots,k_l$ are consecutive integers, which was previously only known for complete flag varieties, Grassmannians, and $\text{Fl}_{1,3;4}$. Finally, we determine which notions of positivity are compatible with a natural action of the cyclic group of order $n$ that rotates the index set.