Researcher profile

Steven Kearnes

Steven Kearnes contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Machine learning on DNA-encoded libraries: A new paradigm for hit-finding

DNA-encoded small molecule libraries (DELs) have enabled discovery of novel inhibitors for many distinct protein targets of therapeutic value through screening of libraries with up to billions of unique small molecules. We demonstrate a new approach applying machine learning to DEL selection data by identifying active molecules from a large commercial collection and a virtual library of easily synthesizable compounds. We train models using only DEL selection data and apply automated or automatable filters with chemist review restricted to the removal of molecules with potential for instability or reactivity. We validate this approach with a large prospective study (nearly 2000 compounds tested) across three diverse protein targets: sEH (a hydrolase), ERα (a nuclear receptor), and c-KIT (a kinase). The approach is effective, with an overall hit rate of {\sim}30% at 30 {\textmu}M and discovery of potent compounds (IC50 <10 nM) for every target. The model makes useful predictions even for molecules dissimilar to the original DEL and the compounds identified are diverse, predominantly drug-like, and different from known ligands. Collectively, the quality and quantity of DEL selection data; the power of modern machine learning methods; and access to large, inexpensive, commercially-available libraries creates a powerful new approach for hit finding.

preprint2019arXiv

Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learning

We present a framework, which we call Molecule Deep $Q$-Networks (MolDQN), for molecule optimization by combining domain knowledge of chemistry and state-of-the-art reinforcement learning techniques (double $Q$-learning and randomized value functions). We directly define modifications on molecules, thereby ensuring 100\% chemical validity. Further, we operate without pre-training on any dataset to avoid possible bias from the choice of that set. Inspired by problems faced during medicinal chemistry lead optimization, we extend our model with multi-objective reinforcement learning, which maximizes drug-likeness while maintaining similarity to the original molecule. We further show the path through chemical space to achieve optimization for a molecule to understand how the model works.

preprint2017arXiv

Machine learning prediction errors better than DFT accuracy

We investigate the impact of choosing regressors and molecular representations for the construction of fast machine learning (ML) models of thirteen electronic ground-state properties of organic molecules. The performance of each regressor/representation/property combination is assessed using learning curves which report out-of-sample errors as a function of training set size with up to $\sim$117k distinct molecules. Molecular structures and properties at hybrid density functional theory (DFT) level of theory used for training and testing come from the QM9 database [Ramakrishnan et al, {\em Scientific Data} {\bf 1} 140022 (2014)] and include dipole moment, polarizability, HOMO/LUMO energies and gap, electronic spatial extent, zero point vibrational energy, enthalpies and free energies of atomization, heat capacity and the highest fundamental vibrational frequency. Various representations from the literature have been studied (Coulomb matrix, bag of bonds, BAML and ECFP4, molecular graphs (MG)), as well as newly developed distribution based variants including histograms of distances (HD), and angles (HDA/MARAD), and dihedrals (HDAD). Regressors include linear models (Bayesian ridge regression (BR) and linear regression with elastic net regularization (EN)), random forest (RF), kernel ridge regression (KRR) and two types of neural net works, graph convolutions (GC) and gated graph networks (GG). We present numerical evidence that ML model predictions deviate from DFT less than DFT deviates from experiment for all properties. Furthermore, our out-of-sample prediction errors with respect to hybrid DFT reference are on par with, or close to, chemical accuracy. Our findings suggest that ML models could be more accurate than hybrid DFT if explicitly electron correlated quantum (or experimental) data was available.