BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stefan Kramer

Stefan Kramer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligencecs.CYGenomicsInformation RetrievalSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fair Group-Shared Representations with Normalizing Flows

The issue of fairness in machine learning stems from the fact that historical data often displays biases against specific groups of people which have been underprivileged in the recent past, or still are. In this context, one of the possible approaches is to employ fair representation learning algorithms which are able to remove biases from data, making groups statistically indistinguishable. In this paper, we instead develop a fair representation learning algorithm which is able to map individuals belonging to different groups in a single group. This is made possible by training a pair of Normalizing Flow models and constraining them to not remove information about the ground truth by training a ranking or classification model on top of them. The overall, ``chained'' model is invertible and has a tractable Jacobian, which allows to relate together the probability densities for different groups and ``translate'' individuals from one group to another. We show experimentally that our methodology is competitive with other fair representation learning algorithms. Furthermore, our algorithm achieves stronger invariance w.r.t. the sensitive attribute.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fair Interpretable Learning via Correction Vectors

Neural network architectures have been extensively employed in the fair representation learning setting, where the objective is to learn a new representation for a given vector which is independent of sensitive information. Various "representation debiasing" techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, as neural networks are inherently opaque, these methods are hard to comprehend, which limits their usefulness. We propose a new framework for fair representation learning which is centered around the learning of "correction vectors", which have the same dimensionality as the given data vectors. The corrections are then simply summed up to the original features, and can therefore be analyzed as an explicit penalty or bonus to each feature. We show experimentally that a fair representation learning problem constrained in such a way does not impact performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fair Interpretable Representation Learning with Correction Vectors

Neural network architectures have been extensively employed in the fair representation learning setting, where the objective is to learn a new representation for a given vector which is independent of sensitive information. Various representation debiasing techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, as neural networks are inherently opaque, these methods are hard to comprehend, which limits their usefulness. We propose a new framework for fair representation learning that is centered around the learning of "correction vectors", which have the same dimensionality as the given data vectors. Correction vectors may be computed either explicitly via architectural constraints or implicitly by training an invertible model based on Normalizing Flows. We show experimentally that several fair representation learning models constrained in such a way do not exhibit losses in ranking or classification performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art results can be achieved by the invertible model. Finally, we discuss the law standing of our methodology in light of recent legislation in the European Union.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Focusing Knowledge-based Graph Argument Mining via Topic Modeling

Decision-making usually takes five steps: identifying the problem, collecting data, extracting evidence, identifying pro and con arguments, and making decisions. Focusing on extracting evidence, this paper presents a hybrid model that combines latent Dirichlet allocation and word embeddings to obtain external knowledge from structured and unstructured data. We study the task of sentence-level argument mining, as arguments mostly require some degree of world knowledge to be identified and understood. Given a topic and a sentence, the goal is to classify whether a sentence represents an argument in regard to the topic. We use a topic model to extract topic- and sentence-specific evidence from the structured knowledge base Wikidata, building a graph based on the cosine similarity between the entity word vectors of Wikidata and the vector of the given sentence. Also, we build a second graph based on topic-specific articles found via Google to tackle the general incompleteness of structured knowledge bases. Combining these graphs, we obtain a graph-based model which, as our evaluation shows, successfully capitalizes on both structured and unstructured data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Pattern Sampling for Shapelet-based Time Series Classification

Subsequence-based time series classification algorithms provide accurate and interpretable models, but training these models is extremely computation intensive. The asymptotic time complexity of subsequence-based algorithms remains a higher-order polynomial, because these algorithms are based on exhaustive search for highly discriminative subsequences. Pattern sampling has been proposed as an effective alternative to mitigate the pattern explosion phenomenon. Therefore, we employ pattern sampling to extract discriminative features from discretized time series data. A weighted trie is created based on the discretized time series data to sample highly discriminative patterns. These sampled patterns are used to identify the shapelets which are used to transform the time series classification problem into a feature-based classification problem. Finally, a classification model can be trained using any off-the-shelf algorithm. Creating a pattern sampler requires a small number of patterns to be evaluated compared to an exhaustive search as employed by previous approaches. Compared to previously proposed algorithms, our approach requires considerably less computational and memory resources. Experiments demonstrate how the proposed approach fares in terms of classification accuracy and runtime performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Deep Unsupervised Identification of Selected SNPs between Adapted Populations on Pool-seq Data

The exploration of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify genetic diversity between different sequencing population pools (Pool-seq) is a fundamental task in genetic research. As underlying sequence reads and their alignment are error-prone and univariate statistical solutions only take individual positions of the genome into account, the identification of selected SNPs remains a challenging process. Deep learning models like convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are able to consider large input areas in their decisions. We suggest an unsupervised pipeline to be independent of a rarely known ground truth. We train a supervised discriminator CNN to distinguish alignments from different populations and utilize the model for unsupervised SNP calling by applying explainable artificial intelligence methods. Our proposed multivariate method is based on two main assumptions: We assume (i) that instances having a high predictive certainty of being distinguishable are likely to contain genetic variants, and (ii) that selected SNPs are located at regions with input features having the highest influence on the model's decision process. We directly compare our method with statistical results on two different Pool-seq datasets and show that our solution is able to extend statistical results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Towards Probability-based Safety Verification of Systems with Components from Machine Learning

Machine learning (ML) has recently created many new success stories. Hence, there is a strong motivation to use ML technology in software-intensive systems, including safety-critical systems. This raises the issue of safety verification of MLbased systems, which is currently thought to be infeasible or, at least, very hard. We think that it requires taking into account specific properties of ML technology such as: (i) Most ML approaches are inductive, which is both their power and their source of error. (ii) Neural networks (NN) resulting from deep learning are at the current state of the art not transparent. Consequently, there will always be errors remaining and, at least for deep NNs (DNNs), verification of their internal structure is extremely hard. In general, safety engineering cannot provide full guarantees that no harm will ever occur. That is why probabilities are used, e.g., for specifying a risk or a Tolerable Hazard Rate (THR). In this vision paper, we propose verification based on probabilities of errors both estimated by controlled experiments and output by the inductively learned classifier itself. Generalization error bounds may propagate to the probabilities of a hazard, which must not exceed a THR. As a result, the quantitatively determined bound on the probability of a classification error of an ML component in a safety-critical system contributes in a well-defined way to the latter's overall safety verification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access