Researcher profile

Srikanth Saripalli

Srikanth Saripalli contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Online Multi-IMU Calibration Using Visual-Inertial Odometry

This work presents a centralized multi-IMU filter framework with online intrinsic and extrinsic calibration for unsynchronized inertial measurement units that is robust against changes in calibration parameters. The novel EKF-based method estimates the positional and rotational offsets of the system of sensors as well as their intrinsic biases without the use of rigid body geometric constraints. Additionally, the filter is flexible in the total number of sensors used while leveraging the commonly used MSCKF framework for camera measurements. The filter framework has been validated using Monte Carlo simulation as well as experimentally. In both simulations and experiments, using multiple IMU measurement streams within the proposed filter framework outperforms the use of a single IMU in a filter prediction step while also producing consistent and accurate estimates of initial calibration errors. Compared to current state-of-the-art optimizers, the filter produces similar intrinsic and extrinsic calibration parameters for each sensor. Finally, an open source repository has been provided at https://github.com/unmannedlab/ekf-cal containing both the online estimator and the simulation used for testing and evaluation.

preprint2022arXiv

Contrastive Learning of Features between Images and LiDAR

Image and Point Clouds provide different information for robots. Finding the correspondences between data from different sensors is crucial for various tasks such as localization, mapping, and navigation. Learning-based descriptors have been developed for single sensors; there is little work on cross-modal features. This work treats learning cross-modal features as a dense contrastive learning problem. We propose a Tuple-Circle loss function for cross-modality feature learning. Furthermore, to learn good features and not lose generality, we developed a variant of widely used PointNet++ architecture for point cloud and U-Net CNN architecture for images. Moreover, we conduct experiments on a real-world dataset to show the effectiveness of our loss function and network structure. We show that our models indeed learn information from both images as well as LiDAR by visualizing the features.

preprint2022arXiv

Extrinsic Calibration of LiDAR, IMU and Camera

In this work we present a novel method to jointly calibrate a sensor suite consisting a 3D-LiDAR, Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and Camera under an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) framework. We exploit pairwise constraints between the 3 sensor pairs to perform EKF update and experimentally demonstrate the superior performance obtained with joint calibration as against individual sensor pair calibration.

preprint2022arXiv

RELLIS-3D Dataset: Data, Benchmarks and Analysis

Semantic scene understanding is crucial for robust and safe autonomous navigation, particularly so in off-road environments. Recent deep learning advances for 3D semantic segmentation rely heavily on large sets of training data, however existing autonomy datasets either represent urban environments or lack multimodal off-road data. We fill this gap with RELLIS-3D, a multimodal dataset collected in an off-road environment, which contains annotations for 13,556 LiDAR scans and 6,235 images. The data was collected on the Rellis Campus of Texas A\&M University and presents challenges to existing algorithms related to class imbalance and environmental topography. Additionally, we evaluate the current state-of-the-art deep learning semantic segmentation models on this dataset. Experimental results show that RELLIS-3D presents challenges for algorithms designed for segmentation in urban environments. This novel dataset provides the resources needed by researchers to continue to develop more advanced algorithms and investigate new research directions to enhance autonomous navigation in off-road environments. RELLIS-3D is available at https://github.com/unmannedlab/RELLIS-3D

preprint2022arXiv

ROOAD: RELLIS Off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset

The development and implementation of visual-inertial odometry (VIO) has focused on structured environments, but interest in localization in off-road environments is growing. In this paper, we present the RELLIS Off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset (ROOAD) which provides high-quality, time-synchronized off-road monocular visual-inertial data sequences to further the development of related research. We evaluated the dataset on two state-of-the-art VIO algorithms, (1) Open-VINS and (2) VINS-Fusion. Our findings indicate that both algorithms perform 2 to 30 times worse on the ROOAD dataset compared to their performance in structured environments. Furthermore, OpenVINS has better tracking stability and real-time performance than VINS-Fusion in the off-road environment, while VINS-Fusion outperformed OpenVINS in tracking accuracy in several data sequences. Since the camera-IMU calibration tool from Kalibr toolkit is used extensively in this work, we have included several calibration data sequences. Our hand measurements show Kalibr's tool achieved +/-1 degree for orientation error and +/-1 mm at best (x- and y-axis) and +/-10 mm (z-axis) at worse for position error in the camera frame between the camera and IMU. This novel dataset provides a new set of scenarios for researchers to design and test their localization algorithms on, as well as critical insights in the current performance of VIO in off-road environments. ROOAD Dataset: github.com/unmannedlab/ROOAD

preprint2021arXiv

Path Optimization for Ground Vehicles in Off-Road Terrain

We present a method for path optimization for ground vehicles in off-road environments at high speeds. This path optimization considers the kinematic constraints of the vehicle. By thinking in the actuator space we can represent these constraints as limits in the space rather than derived properties of the path. In this paper we present a actuator space approach to path optimization for off-road ground vehicles. This is done by representing and operation on the path as a list of steering angles over the path length. This transforms the set of kinematic constraints into constraints on the steering angle. We then put this path into a gradient descent solver. This produced paths that are kinematically feasible and optimized in accordance with our cost function. Finally, we tested the system both in simulation and on an off-road vehicle at speeds of 5 m/s.

preprint2020arXiv

Collaborative Localization for Micro Aerial Vehicles

In this paper, we present a framework for performing collaborative localization for groups of micro aerial vehicles (MAV) that use vision based sensing. The vehicles are each assumed to be equipped with a forward-facing monocular camera, and to be capable of communicating with each other. This collaborative localization approach is developed as a decentralized algorithm and built in a distributed fashion where individual and relative pose estimation techniques are combined for the group to localize against surrounding environments. The MAVs initially detect and match salient features between each other to create a sparse reconstruction of the observed environment, which acts as a global map. Once a map is available, each MAV performs feature detection and tracking with a robust outlier rejection process to estimate its own pose in 6 degrees of freedom. Occasionally, one or more MAVs can be tasked to compute poses for another MAV through relative measurements, which is achieved by exploiting multiple view geometry concepts. These relative measurements are then fused with individual measurements in a consistent fashion. We present the results of the algorithm on image data from MAV flights both in simulation and real life, and discuss the advantages of collaborative localization in improving pose estimation accuracy.

preprint2020arXiv

Experimental Evaluation of 3D-LIDAR Camera Extrinsic Calibration

In this paper we perform an experimental comparison of three different target based 3D-LIDAR camera calibration algorithms. We briefly elucidate the mathematical background behind each method and provide insights into practical aspects like ease of data collection for all of them. We extensively evaluate these algorithms on a sensor suite which consists multiple cameras and LIDARs by assessing their robustness to random initialization and by using metrics like Mean Line Re-projection Error (MLRE) and Factory Stereo Calibration Error. We also show the effect of noisy sensor on the calibration result from all the algorithms and conclude with a note on which calibration algorithm should be used under what circumstances.

preprint2020arXiv

Extrinsic Calibration of a 3D-LIDAR and a Camera

This work presents an extrinsic parameter estimation algorithm between a 3D LIDAR and a Projective Camera using a marker-less planar target, by exploiting Planar Surface Point to Plane and Planar Edge Point to back-projected Plane geometric constraints. The proposed method uses the data collected by placing the planar board at different poses in the common field of view of the LIDAR and the Camera. The steps include, detection of the target and the edges of the target in LIDAR and Camera frames, matching the detected planes and lines across both the sensing modalities and finally solving a cost function formed by the aforementioned geometric constraints that link the features detected in both the LIDAR and the Camera using non-linear least squares. We have extensively validated our algorithm using two Basler Cameras, Velodyne VLP-32 and Ouster OS1 LIDARs.