BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sophie N. Parragh

Sophie N. Parragh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCDiscrete MathematicsMathematical Software

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Electric Autonomous Dial-A-Ride Problem

The Electric Autonomous Dial-A-Ride Problem (E-ADARP) consists in scheduling a fleet of electric autonomous vehicles to provide ride-sharing services for customers that specify their origins and destinations. The E-ADARP differs from the classical DARP in two aspects: (i) a weighted-sum objective that minimizes both total travel time and total excess user ride time; (ii) the employment of electric autonomous vehicles and a partial recharging policy. This paper presents a highly-efficient labeling algorithm, which is integrated into Branch-and-Price (B&P) algorithms to solve the E-ADARP. To handle (i), we introduce a fragment-based representation of paths. A novel approach is invoked to abstract fragments to arcs while ensuring excess-user-ride-time optimality. We then construct a new graph that preserves all feasible routes of the original graph by enumerating all feasible fragments, abstracting them to arcs, and connecting them with each other, depots, and recharging stations in a feasible way. On the new graph, partial recharging (ii) is tackled exactly by tailored Resource Extension Functions (REFs). We apply strong dominance rules and constant-time feasibility checks to compute the shortest paths efficiently. These methods construct the first labeling algorithm that can deal with minimizing (excess) user ride time. In the computational experiments, the B&P algorithm achieves optimality in 71 out of 84 instances. Remarkably, among these instances, 50 were solved optimally at the root node without branching. We identify 26 new best solutions, improve 30 previously reported lower bounds, and provide 17 new lower bounds for large-scale instances with up to 8 vehicles and 96 requests. In total 42 new best solutions are generated on previously solved and unsolved instances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Adaptive Improvements of Multi-Objective Branch and Bound

Branch and bound methods which are based on the principle "divide and conquer" are a well established solution approach in single-objective integer programming. In multi-objective optimization branch and bound algorithms are increasingly attracting interest. However, the larger number of objectives raises additional difficulties for implicit enumeration approaches like branch and bound. Since bounding and pruning is considerably weaker in multiple objectives, many branches have to be (partially) searched and may not be pruned directly. The adaptive use of objective space information can guide the search in promising directions to determine a good approximation of the Pareto front already in early stages of the algorithm. In particular we focus in this article on improving the branching and queuing of subproblems and the handling of lower bound sets. In our numerical test we evaluate the impact of the proposed methods in comparison to a standard implementation of multiobjective branch and bound on knapsack problems, generalized assignment problems and (un)capacitated facility location problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming

Many real-world optimisation problems involve multiple objectives. When considered concurrently, they give rise to a set of optimal trade-off solutions, also known as efficient solutions. These solutions have the property that neither objective can be improved without deteriorating another objective. Motivated by the success of matheuristics in the single-objective domain, we propose a linear programming-based matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming. To achieve a high-quality approximation of the optimal set of trade-off solutions, a lower bound set is first obtained using the vector linear programming solver Bensolve. Then, feasibility pump-based ideas in combination with path relinking are applied in novel ways so as to obtain a high quality upper bound set. Our matheuristic is compared to a recently-suggested algorithm that is, to the best of our knowledge, the only existing matheuristic method for tri-objective integer programming. In an extensive computational study, we show that our method generates a better approximation of the true Pareto front than the benchmark method on a large set of tri-objective benchmark instances. Since the developed approach starts from a potentially fractional lower bound set, it may also be used as a primal heuristic in the context of linear relaxation-based multi-objective branch-and-bound algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A LP relaxation based matheuristic for multi-objective integer programming

Motivated by their success in the single-objective domain, we propose a very simple linear programming-based matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming. To tackle the problem, we obtain lower bound sets by means of the vector linear programming solver Bensolve. Then, simple heuristic approaches, such as rounding and path relinking, are applied to this lower bound set to obtain high-quality approximations of the optimal set of trade-off solutions. The proposed algorithm is compared to a recently suggested algorithm which is, to the best of our knowledge, the only existing matheuristic method for tri-objective integer programming. Computational experiments show that our method produces a better approximation of the true Pareto front using significantly less time than the benchmark method on standard benchmark instances for the three-objective knapsack problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem

In many real-world optimization problems, more than one objective plays a role and input parameters are subject to uncertainty. In this paper, motivated by applications in disaster relief and public facility location, we model and solve a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem. The considered objectives are cost and uncovered demand, whereas the demand at the different population centers is uncertain but its probability distribution is known. The latter information is used to produce a set of scenarios. In order to solve the underlying optimization problem, we apply a Benders' type decomposition approach which is known as the L-shaped method for stochastic programming and we embed it into a recently developed branch-and-bound framework for bi-objective integer optimization. We analyze and compare different cut generation schemes and we show how they affect lower bound set computations, so as to identify the best performing approach. Finally, we compare the branch-and-Benders-cut approach to a straight-forward branch-and-bound implementation based on the deterministic equivalent formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access