BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Fabien Tricoire

Fabien Tricoire contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A lexicographic maximin approach to the selective assessment routing problem

Max-min approaches have been widely applied to address equity as an essential consideration in humanitarian operations. These approaches, however, have a significant drawback of being neutral when it comes to solutions with the same minimum values. These equivalent solutions, from a max-min point of view, might be significantly different. We address this problem using the lexicographic maximin approach, a refinement of the classic max-min approach. We apply this approach in the rapid needs assessment process, which is carried out immediately after the onset of a disaster, to investigate the disaster's impact on the affected community groups through field visits. We construct routes for an assessment plan to cover community groups, each carrying a distinct characteristic, such that the vector of coverage ratios are maximized. We define the leximin selective assessment problem, which considers the bi-objective optimization of total assessment time and coverage ratio vector maximization. We solve the bi-objective problem by a heuristic approach based on the multi-directional local search framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming

Many real-world optimisation problems involve multiple objectives. When considered concurrently, they give rise to a set of optimal trade-off solutions, also known as efficient solutions. These solutions have the property that neither objective can be improved without deteriorating another objective. Motivated by the success of matheuristics in the single-objective domain, we propose a linear programming-based matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming. To achieve a high-quality approximation of the optimal set of trade-off solutions, a lower bound set is first obtained using the vector linear programming solver Bensolve. Then, feasibility pump-based ideas in combination with path relinking are applied in novel ways so as to obtain a high quality upper bound set. Our matheuristic is compared to a recently-suggested algorithm that is, to the best of our knowledge, the only existing matheuristic method for tri-objective integer programming. In an extensive computational study, we show that our method generates a better approximation of the true Pareto front than the benchmark method on a large set of tri-objective benchmark instances. Since the developed approach starts from a potentially fractional lower bound set, it may also be used as a primal heuristic in the context of linear relaxation-based multi-objective branch-and-bound algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A LP relaxation based matheuristic for multi-objective integer programming

Motivated by their success in the single-objective domain, we propose a very simple linear programming-based matheuristic for tri-objective binary integer programming. To tackle the problem, we obtain lower bound sets by means of the vector linear programming solver Bensolve. Then, simple heuristic approaches, such as rounding and path relinking, are applied to this lower bound set to obtain high-quality approximations of the optimal set of trade-off solutions. The proposed algorithm is compared to a recently suggested algorithm which is, to the best of our knowledge, the only existing matheuristic method for tri-objective integer programming. Computational experiments show that our method produces a better approximation of the true Pareto front using significantly less time than the benchmark method on standard benchmark instances for the three-objective knapsack problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem

In many real-world optimization problems, more than one objective plays a role and input parameters are subject to uncertainty. In this paper, motivated by applications in disaster relief and public facility location, we model and solve a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem. The considered objectives are cost and uncovered demand, whereas the demand at the different population centers is uncertain but its probability distribution is known. The latter information is used to produce a set of scenarios. In order to solve the underlying optimization problem, we apply a Benders' type decomposition approach which is known as the L-shaped method for stochastic programming and we embed it into a recently developed branch-and-bound framework for bi-objective integer optimization. We analyze and compare different cut generation schemes and we show how they affect lower bound set computations, so as to identify the best performing approach. Finally, we compare the branch-and-Benders-cut approach to a straight-forward branch-and-bound implementation based on the deterministic equivalent formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access