BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

So Yamagata

So Yamagata contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.GRmath.GT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A lexicographic section of the braid arrangement and the modified Artin presentation

We study a specific line arrangement obtained from a generic $2$-section of the braid arrangement, and compute the fundamental group of its complement via braid monodromy. We show that the resulting presentation of the fundamental group coincides, under the identification of generators, with the modified Artin presentation introduced by Margalit and McCammond. Moreover, we extend the construction to the Manin--Schechtman arrangements $MS(n, k)$, which are higher analogues of the braid arrangement. Focusing on the case $k = 2$, we obtain an explicit presentation of $π_1(\mathbb{C}^n \setminus MS(n, 2))$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A linear condition for non-very generic discriminantal arrangements

The discriminantal arrangement is the space of configurations of $n$ hyperplanes in generic position in a $k$ dimensional space (see \cite{MS}). Differently from the case $k=1$ in which it corresponds to the well known braid arrangement, the discriminantal arrangement in the case $k>1$ has a combinatorics which depends from the choice of the original $n$ hyperplanes. It is known that this combinatorics is constant in an open Zariski set $\mathcal{Z}$, but to assess wether or not $n$ fixed hyperplanes in generic position belongs to $\mathcal{Z}$ proved to be a nontrivial problem. Even to simply provide examples of configurations not in $\mathcal{Z}$ is still a difficult task. In this paper, moving from a recent result in \cite{SSc}, we define a $\textit{weak linear independency}$ condition among sets of vectors which, if imposed, allows to build configurations of hyperplanes not in $\mathcal{Z}$. We provide $3$ examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the non-very generic intersections in discriminantal arrangements

In 1985 Crapo introduced in \cite{Crapo} a new mathematical object that he called $\textit{geometry of circuits}$. Four years later, in 1989, Manin and Schechtman defined in \cite{MS} the same object and called it $\textit{discriminantal arrangement}$, the name by which it is known now a days. Those discriminantal arrangements $\mathcal{B}(n,k,\mathcal{A}^0)$ are builded from an arrangement $\mathcal{A}^0$ of $n$ hyperplanes in general position in a $k$-dimensional space and their combinatorics depends on the arrangement $\mathcal{A}^0$. On this basis, in 1997 Bayer and Brandt (see \cite{BB}) distinguished two different type of arrangements $\mathcal{A}^0$ calling $\textit{very generic}$ the ones for which the intersection lattice of $\mathcal{B}(n,k,\mathcal{A}^0)$ has maximum cardinality and $\textit{non-very generic}$ the others. Results on the combinatorics of $\mathcal{B}(n,k,\mathcal{A}^0)$ in the very generic case already appear in Crapo \cite{Crapo} and in 1997 in Athanasiadis \cite{Atha} while the first known result on non-very generic case is due to Libgober and the first author in 2018. In their paper \cite{LS} they provided a necessary and sufficient condition on $\mathcal{A}^0$ for which the cardinality of rank 2 intersections in $\mathcal{B}(n,k,\mathcal{A}^0)$ is not maximal anymore. In this paper we further develop their result providing a sufficient condition on $\mathcal{A}^0$ for which the cardinality of rank r, $r \geq 2$, intersections in $\mathcal{B}(n,k,\mathcal{A}^0)$ decreases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access