BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Simon Scheidegger

Simon Scheidegger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
econ.GNq-fin.ECComputational Engineering, Finance, and Scienceecon.EMphysics.atom-phphysics.soc-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom

We present a method to precisly measure the frequencies of transitions to high-$n$ Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom which are not subject to uncontrolled systematic shifts caused by stray electric fields. The method consists in recording Stark spectra of the field-insensitive $k=0$ Stark states and the field-sensitive $k=\pm2$ Stark states, which are used to calibrate the electric field strength. We illustrate this method with measurements of transitions from the $2\,\text{s}(f=0\text{ and } 1)$ hyperfine levels in the presence of intentionally applied electric fields with strengths in the range between $0.4$ and $1.6\,$Vcm$^{-1}$. The slightly field-dependent $k=0$ level energies are corrected with a precisely calculated shift to obtain the corresponding Bohr energies $\left(-cR_{\mathrm{H}}/n^2\right)$. The energy difference between $n=20$ and $n=24$ obtained with our method agrees with Bohr's formula within the $10\,$kHz experimental uncertainty. We also determined the hyperfine splitting of the $2\,\text{s}$ state by taking the difference between transition frequencies from the $2\,\text{s}(f=0 \text{ and }1)$ levels to the $n=20,k=0$ Stark states. Our results demonstrate the possibility of carrying out precision measurements in high-$n$ hydrogenic quantum states.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Detecting Edgeworth Cycles

We develop and test algorithms to detect "Edgeworth cycles," which are asymmetric price movements that have caused antitrust concerns in many countries. We formalize four existing methods and propose six new methods based on spectral analysis and machine learning. We evaluate their accuracy in station-level gasoline-price data from Western Australia, New South Wales, and Germany. Most methods achieve high accuracy in the first two, but only a few can detect the nuanced cycles in the third. Results suggest whether researchers find a positive or negative statistical relationship between cycles and markups, and hence their implications for competition policy, crucially depends on the choice of methods. We conclude with a set of practical recommendations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

High-Dimensional Dynamic Stochastic Model Representation

We propose a scalable method for computing global solutions of nonlinear, high-dimensional dynamic stochastic economic models. First, within a time iteration framework, we approximate economic policy functions using an adaptive, high-dimensional model representation scheme, combined with adaptive sparse grids to address the ubiquitous challenge of the curse of dimensionality. Moreover, the adaptivity within the individual component functions increases sparsity since grid points are added only where they are most needed, that is, in regions with steep gradients or at nondifferentiabilities. Second, we introduce a performant vectorization scheme for the interpolation compute kernel. Third, the algorithm is hybrid parallelized, leveraging both distributed- and shared-memory architectures. We observe significant speedups over the state-of-the-art techniques, and almost ideal strong scaling up to at least $1,000$ compute nodes of a Cray XC$50$ system at the Swiss National Supercomputing Center. Finally, to demonstrate our method's broad applicability, we compute global solutions to two variates of a high-dimensional international real business cycle model up to $300$ continuous state variables. In addition, we highlight a complementary advantage of the framework, which allows for a priori analysis of the model complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The climate in climate economics

To analyze climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models - climate emulators. We propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that is based on Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5). We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon. We propose to use four different test cases: two tests to separately calibrate and evaluate the carbon cycle and temperature response, a test to quantify the transient climate response, and a final test to evaluate the performance for scenarios close to those arising from economic models. We re-calibrate the climate part of the widely used DICE-2016: the multi-model mean as well as extreme, but still permissible climate sensitivities and carbon cycle responses. We demonstrate that the functional form of the climate emulator of the DICE-2016 model is fit for purpose, despite its simplicity, but its carbon cycle and temperature equations are miscalibrated. We examine the importance of the calibration for the social cost of carbon in the context of a partial equilibrium setting where interest rates are exogenous, as well as the simple general equilibrium setting from DICE-2016. We find that the model uncertainty from different consistent calibrations of the climate system can change the social cost of carbon by a factor of four if one assumes a quadratic damage function. When calibrated to the multi-model mean, our model predicts similar values for the social cost of carbon as the original DICE-2016, but with a strongly reduced sensitivity to the discount rate and about one degree less long-term warming. The social cost of carbon in DICE-2016 is oversensitive to the discount rate, leading to extreme comparative statics responses to changes in preferences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Deep Structural Estimation: With an Application to Option Pricing

We propose a novel structural estimation framework in which we train a surrogate of an economic model with deep neural networks. Our methodology alleviates the curse of dimensionality and speeds up the evaluation and parameter estimation by orders of magnitudes, which significantly enhances one's ability to conduct analyses that require frequent parameter re-estimation. As an empirical application, we compare two popular option pricing models (the Heston and the Bates model with double-exponential jumps) against a non-parametric random forest model. We document that: a) the Bates model produces better out-of-sample pricing on average, but both structural models fail to outperform random forest for large areas of the volatility surface; b) random forest is more competitive at short horizons (e.g., 1-day), for short-dated options (with less than 7 days to maturity), and on days with poor liquidity; c) both structural models outperform random forest in out-of-sample delta hedging; d) the Heston model's relative performance has deteriorated significantly after the 2008 financial crisis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access