BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Simon R. Blackburn

Simon R. Blackburn contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.GRDiscrete Mathematicsmath.NTCryptography and Securitymath.GTmath.RA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The enumeration of finite rings

Let $p$ be a fixed prime. We show that the number of isomorphism classes of finite rings of order $p^n$ is $p^α$, where $α=\frac{4}{27}n^3+O(n^{5/2})$. This result was stated (with a weaker error term) by Kruse and Price in 1969; a problem with their proof was pointed out by Knopfmacher in 1973. We also show that the number of isomorphism classes of finite commutative rings of order $p^n$ is $p^β$, where $β=\frac{2}{27}n^3+O(n^{5/2})$. This result was stated (again with a weaker error term) by Poonen in 2008, with a proof that relies on the problematic step in Kruse and Price's argument.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Block-avoiding point sequencings

Let $n$ and $\ell$ be positive integers. Recent papers by Kreher, Stinson and Veitch have explored variants of the problem of ordering the points in a triple system (such as a Steiner triple system, directed triple system or Mendelsohn triple system) on $n$ points so that no block occurs in a segment of $\ell$ consecutive entries (thus the ordering is locally block-avoiding). We describe a greedy algorithm which shows that such an ordering exists, provided that $n$ is sufficiently large when compared to $\ell$. This algorithm leads to improved bounds on the number of points in cases where this was known, but also extends the results to a significantly more general setting (which includes, for example, orderings that avoid the blocks of a design). Similar results for a cyclic variant of this situation are also established. We construct Steiner triple systems and quadruple systems where $\ell$ can be large, showing that a bound of Stinson and Veitch is reasonable. Moreover, we generalise the Stinson--Veitch bound to a wider class of block designs and to the cyclic case. The results of Kreher, Stinson and Veitch were originally inspired by results of Alspach, Kreher and Pastine, who (motivated by zero-sum avoiding sequences in abelian groups) were interested in orderings of points in a partial Steiner triple system where no segment is a union of disjoint blocks. Alspach~\emph{et al.}\ show that, when the system contains at most $k$ pairwise disjoint blocks, an ordering exists when the number of points is more than $15k-5$. By making use of a greedy approach, the paper improves this bound to $9k+O(k^{2/3})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Enumerating finite racks, quandles and kei

A rack of order $n$ is a binary operation $\rack$ on a set $X$ of cardinality $n$, such that right multiplication is an automorphism. More precisely, $(X,\rack)$ is a rack provided that the map $x\mapsto x\rack y$ is a bijection for all $y\in X$, and $(x\rack y)\rack z=(x\rack z)\rack (y\rack z)$ for all $x,y,z\in X$. The paper provides upper and lower bounds of the form $2^{cn^2}$ on the number of isomorphism classes of racks of order $n$. Similar results on the number of isomorphism classes of quandles and kei are obtained. The results of the paper are established by first showing how an arbitrary rack is related to its operator group (the permutation group on $X$ generated by the maps $x\mapsto x\rack y$ for $y\in Y$), and then applying some of the theory of permutation groups. The relationship between a rack and its operator group extends results of Joyce and of Ryder; this relationship might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the Distribution of the Subset Sum Pseudorandom Number Generator on Elliptic Curves

Given a prime $p$, an elliptic curve $\E/\F_p$ over the finite field $\F_p$ of $p$ elements and a binary \lrs\ $\(u(n)\)_{n =1}^\infty$ of order~$r$, we study the distribution of the sequence of points $$ \sum_{j=0}^{r-1} u(n+j)P_j, \qquad n =1,..., N, $$ on average over all possible choices of $\F_p$-rational points $P_1,..., P_r$ on~$\E$. For a sufficiently large $N$ we improve and generalise a previous result in this direction due to E.~El~Mahassni.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The asymptotic behavior of Grassmannian codes

The iterated Johnson bound is the best known upper bound on a size of an error-correcting code in the Grassmannian $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$. The iterated Schönheim bound is the best known lower bound on the size of a covering code in $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$. We use probabilistic methods to prove that both bounds are asymptotically attained for fixed $k$ and fixed radius, as $n$ approaches infinity. We also determine the asymptotics of the size of the best Grassmannian codes and covering codes when $n-k$ and the radius are fixed, as $n$ approaches infinity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Constructing k-radius sequences

An n-ary k-radius sequence is a finite sequence of elements taken from an alphabet of size n such that any two distinct elements of the alphabet occur within distance k of each other somewhere in the sequence. These sequences were introduced by Jaromczyk and Lonc to model a caching strategy for computing certain functions on large data sets such as medical images. Let f_k(n) be the shortest length of any k-radius sequence. We improve on earlier estimates for f_k(n) by using tilings and logarithms. The main result is that f_k(n) ~ n^2/(2k) as n tends to infinity whenever a certain tiling of Z^r exists. In particular this result holds for infinitely many k, including all k < 195 and all k such that k+1 or 2k+1 is prime. For certain k, in particular when 2k+1 is prime, we get a sharper error term using the theory of logarithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Putting Dots in Triangles

Given a right-angled triangle of squares in a grid whose horizontal and vertical sides are $n$ squares long, let N(n) denote the maximum number of dots that can be placed into the cells of the triangle such that each row, each column, and each diagonal parallel to the long side of the triangle contains at most one dot. It has been proven that $N(n) = \lfloor \frac{2n+1}{3} \rfloor$. In this note, we give a new proof of this result using linear programming techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access