Researcher profile

Simon J. Clarke

Simon J. Clarke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

$\require{mhchem}$Misfit phase $\ce{(BiSe)_{$1.10$}NbSe2}$ as the origin of superconductivity in nobium-doped bismuth selenide

$\require{mhchem}$Topological superconductivity is of great contemporary interest and has been proposed in doped $\ce{Bi2Se3}$ in which electron-donating atoms such as Cu, Sr or Nb have been intercalated into the $\ce{Bi2Se3}$ structure. For $\ce{Nb_{x}Bi2Se3}$, with $\text{T}_\text{c} \sim 3 \ \text{K}$, it is assumed in the literature that Nb is inserted in the van der Waals gap. However, in this work an alternative origin for the superconductivity in Nb-doped $\ce{Bi2Se3}$ is established. In contrast to previous reports, it is deduced that Nb intercalation in $\ce{Bi2Se3}$ does not take place. Instead, the superconducting behaviour in samples of nominal composition $\ce{Nb_{x}Bi2Se3}$ results from the $\ce{(BiSe)_{$1.10$}NbSe2}$ misfit phase that is present in the sample as an impurity phase for small $x$ ($0.01 \leq x \leq 0.10$) and as a main phase for large $x$ ($x = 0.50$). The structure of this misfit phase is studied in detail using a combination of X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy techniques.

preprint2020arXiv

Robustness of superconducting properties to transition metal substitution and impurity phases in Fe1-xVxSe

We have performed transverse- and zero-field muon spin rotation/relaxation experiments, as well as magnetometry measurements, on samples of Fe1-xVxSe and their Li+NH3 intercalates Li0.6(NH2)0.2(NH3)0.8 Fe1-x Vx Se. We examine the low vanadium substitution regime: x = 0.005, 0.01, and 0.02. The intercalation reaction significantly increases the critical temperature (Tc) and the superfluid stiffness for all x. The nonintercalated samples all exhibit Tc = 8.5 K while the intercalated samples all show an enhanced Tc > 40 K. Vanadium substitution has a negligible effect on Tc, but seems to suppress the superfluid stiffness for the nonintercalated samples and weakly enhance it for the intercalated materials. The optimal substitution level for the intercalated samples is found to be x = 0.01, with Tc = 41 K and λ_{ab}(0) = 0.18 μm. The nonintercalated samples can be modeled with either a single d-wave superconducting gap or with an anisotropic gap function based on recent quasiparticle imaging experiments, whereas the intercalates display multigap nodal behavior which can be fitted using s + d- or d + d-wave models. Magnetism, likely from iron impurities, appears after the intercalation reaction and coexists and competes with the superconductivity. However, it appears that the superconductivity is remarkably robust to the impurity phase, providing an avenue to stably improve the superconducting properties of transition metal substituted FeSe.

preprint2010arXiv

Control via electron count of the competition between magnetism and superconductivity in cobalt and nickel doped NaFeAs

Using a combination of neutron, muon and synchrotron techniques we show how the magnetic state in NaFeAs can be tuned into superconductivity by replacing Fe by either Co or Ni. Electron count is the dominant factor, since Ni-doping has double the effect of Co-doping for the same doping level. We follow the structural, magnetic and superconducting properties as a function of doping to show how the superconducting state evolves, concluding that the addition of 0.1 electrons per Fe atom is sufficient to traverse the superconducting domain, and that magnetic order coexists with superconductivity at doping levels less than 0.025 electrons per Fe atom.