BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shouhao Zhou

Shouhao Zhou contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Evidence synthesis with reconstructed survival data

We present a general approach to synthesizing evidence of time-to-event endpoints in meta-analyses of aggregate data (AD). Our work goes beyond most previous meta-analytic research by using reconstructed survival data as a source of information. A Bayesian multilevel regression model, called the "meta-analysis of reconstructed survival data" (MARS), is introduced, by modeling and integrating reconstructed survival information with other types of summary data, to estimate the hazard ratio function and survival probabilities. The method attempts to reduce selection bias, and relaxes the presumption of proportional hazards in individual clinical studies from the conventional approaches restricted to hazard ratio estimates. Theoretically, we establish the asymptotic consistency of MARS, and investigate its relative efficiency with respect to the individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. In simulation studies, the MARS demonstrated comparable performance to IPD meta-analysis with minor deviation from the true values, suggesting great robustness and efficiency achievable in AD meta-analysis with finite sample. Finally, we applied MARS in a meta-analysis of acute myeloid leukemia to assess the association of minimal residual disease with survival, to help respond to FDA's emerging concerns on translational use of surrogate biomarker in drug development of hematologic malignancies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Note on Bayesian Modeling Specification of Censored Data in JAGS

Just Another Gibbs Sampling (JAGS) is a convenient tool to draw posterior samples using Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian modeling. However, the built-in function dinterval() to model censored data misspecifies the computation of deviance function, which may limit its usage to perform likelihood based model comparison. To establish an automatic approach to specify the correct deviance function in JAGS, we propose a simple alternative modeling strategy to implement Bayesian model selection for analysis of censored outcomes. The proposed approach is applicable to a broad spectrum of data types, which include survival data and many other right-, left- and interval-censored Bayesian model structures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Posterior Averaging Information Criterion

We propose a new model selection method, the posterior averaging information criterion, for Bayesian model assessment from a predictive perspective. The theoretical foundation is built on the Kullback-Leibler divergence to quantify the similarity between the proposed candidate model and the underlying true model. From a Bayesian perspective, our method evaluates the candidate models over the entire posterior distribution in terms of predicting a future independent observation. Without assuming that the true distribution is contained in the candidate models, the new criterion is developed by correcting the asymptotic bias of the posterior mean of the log-likelihood against its expected log-likelihood. It can be generally applied even for Bayesian models with degenerate non-informative prior. The simulation in both normal and binomial settings demonstrates decent small sample performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access