BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shishir Rao

Shishir Rao contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Clinical outcome prediction under hypothetical interventions -- a representation learning framework for counterfactual reasoning

Most machine learning (ML) models are developed for prediction only; offering no option for causal interpretation of their predictions or parameters/properties. This can hamper the health systems' ability to employ ML models in clinical decision-making processes, where the need and desire for predicting outcomes under hypothetical investigations (i.e., counterfactual reasoning/explanation) is high. In this research, we introduce a new representation learning framework (i.e., partial concept bottleneck), which considers the provision of counterfactual explanations as an embedded property of the risk model. Despite architectural changes necessary for jointly optimising for prediction accuracy and counterfactual reasoning, the accuracy of our approach is comparable to prediction-only models. Our results suggest that our proposed framework has the potential to help researchers and clinicians improve personalised care (e.g., by investigating the hypothetical differential effects of interventions)

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

An explainable Transformer-based deep learning model for the prediction of incident heart failure

Predicting the incidence of complex chronic conditions such as heart failure is challenging. Deep learning models applied to rich electronic health records may improve prediction but remain unexplainable hampering their wider use in medical practice. We developed a novel Transformer deep-learning model for more accurate and yet explainable prediction of incident heart failure involving 100,071 patients from longitudinal linked electronic health records across the UK. On internal 5-fold cross validation and held-out external validation, our model achieved 0.93 and 0.93 area under the receiver operator curve and 0.69 and 0.70 area under the precision-recall curve, respectively and outperformed existing deep learning models. Predictor groups included all community and hospital diagnoses and medications contextualised within the age and calendar year for each patient's clinical encounter. The importance of contextualised medical information was revealed in a number of sensitivity analyses, and our perturbation method provided a way of identifying factors contributing to risk. Many of the identified risk factors were consistent with existing knowledge from clinical and epidemiological research but several new associations were revealed which had not been considered in expert-driven risk prediction models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Risk factor identification for incident heart failure using neural network distillation and variable selection

Recent evidence shows that deep learning models trained on electronic health records from millions of patients can deliver substantially more accurate predictions of risk compared to their statistical counterparts. While this provides an important opportunity for improving clinical decision-making, the lack of interpretability is a major barrier to the incorporation of these black-box models in routine care, limiting their trustworthiness and preventing further hypothesis-testing investigations. In this study, we propose two methods, namely, model distillation and variable selection, to untangle hidden patterns learned by an established deep learning model (BEHRT) for risk association identification. Due to the clinical importance and diversity of heart failure as a phenotype, it was used to showcase the merits of the proposed methods. A cohort with 788,880 (8.3% incident heart failure) patients was considered for the study. Model distillation identified 598 and 379 diseases that were associated and dissociated with heart failure at the population level, respectively. While the associations were broadly consistent with prior knowledge, our method also highlighted several less appreciated links that are worth further investigation. In addition to these important population-level insights, we developed an approach to individual-level interpretation to take account of varying manifestation of heart failure in clinical practice. This was achieved through variable selection by detecting a minimal set of encounters that can maximally preserve the accuracy of prediction for individuals. Our proposed work provides a discovery-enabling tool to identify risk factors in both population and individual levels from a data-driven perspective. This helps to generate new hypotheses and guides further investigations on causal links.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Deep Bayesian Gaussian Processes for Uncertainty Estimation in Electronic Health Records

One major impediment to the wider use of deep learning for clinical decision making is the difficulty of assigning a level of confidence to model predictions. Currently, deep Bayesian neural networks and sparse Gaussian processes are the main two scalable uncertainty estimation methods. However, deep Bayesian neural network suffers from lack of expressiveness, and more expressive models such as deep kernel learning, which is an extension of sparse Gaussian process, captures only the uncertainty from the higher level latent space. Therefore, the deep learning model under it lacks interpretability and ignores uncertainty from the raw data. In this paper, we merge features of the deep Bayesian learning framework with deep kernel learning to leverage the strengths of both methods for more comprehensive uncertainty estimation. Through a series of experiments on predicting the first incidence of heart failure, diabetes and depression applied to large-scale electronic medical records, we demonstrate that our method is better at capturing uncertainty than both Gaussian processes and deep Bayesian neural networks in terms of indicating data insufficiency and distinguishing true positive and false positive predictions, with a comparable generalisation performance. Furthermore, by assessing the accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve over the predictive probability, we show that our method is less susceptible to making overconfident predictions, especially for the minority class in imbalanced datasets. Finally, we demonstrate how uncertainty information derived by the model can inform risk factor analysis towards model interpretability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access