Source author record

Shigeru Nemoto

Shigeru Nemoto appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

A Deep-Learning Approach for Operation of an Automated Realtime Flare Forecast

Automated forecasts serve important role in space weather science, by providing statistical insights to flare-trigger mechanisms, and by enabling tailor-made forecasts and high-frequency forecasts. Only by realtime forecast we can experimentally measure the performance of flare-forecasting methods while confidently avoiding overlearning. We have been operating unmanned flare forecast service since August, 2015 that provides 24-hour-ahead forecast of solar flares, every 12 minutes. We report the method and prediction results of the system.

preprint2015arXiv

UFCORIN: A Fully Automated Predictor of Solar Flares in GOES X-Ray Flux

We have developed UFCORIN, a platform for studying and automating space weather prediction. Using our system we have tested 6,160 different combinations of SDO/HMI data as input data, and simulated the prediction of GOES X-ray flux for 2 years (2011-2012) with one-hour cadence. We have found that direct comparison of the true skill statistics (TSS) from small cross-validation sets is ill-posed, and used the standard scores ($z$) of the TSS to compare the performance of the various prediction strategies. The $z$ of a strategy is a stochastic variable of the stochastically-chosen cross-validation dataset, and the $z$ for the three strategies best at predicting X, $\geq$M and $\geq$C class flares are better than the average $z$ of the 6,160 strategies by 2.3$σ$, 2.1$σ$, 3.8$σ$ confidence levels, respectively. The best three TSS values were $0.75\pm0.07$, $0.48\pm0.02$, and $0.56\pm0.04$, respectively.