BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sharan Vaswani

Sharan Vaswani contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.OCArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Augmented Lagrangian Method for Last-Iterate Convergence for Constrained MDPs

We study policy optimization for infinite-horizon, discounted constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs). While existing theoretical guarantees typically hold for the mixture policy, deploying such a policy is computationally and memory intensive. This leads to a practical mismatch where a single (last-iterate) policy must be deployed. Recent theoretical works have thus focused on proving last-iterate convergence, but are largely limited to the tabular setting or to algorithmic variants that are rarely used in practice. To address this, we use the classic inexact augmented Lagrangian ($\texttt{AL}$) method from constrained optimization, and propose a general framework with provable last-iterate convergence for CMDPs. We first focus on the tabular setting and propose to solve the $\texttt{AL}$ sub-problem with projected Q-ascent ($\texttt{PQA}$). Combining the theoretical guarantees of $\texttt{PQA}$ and the standard $\texttt{AL}$ analysis enables us to establish global last-iterate convergence. We generalize these results to handle log-linear policies, and demonstrate that an efficient, projected variant of $\texttt{PQA}$ can achieve last-iterate convergence with comparable guarantees as prior work. Finally, we demonstrate that our framework scales to complex non-linear policies, and evaluate it on continuous control tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved Policy Optimization for Online Imitation Learning

We consider online imitation learning (OIL), where the task is to find a policy that imitates the behavior of an expert via active interaction with the environment. We aim to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of policy optimization algorithms for OIL by analyzing one of the most popular OIL algorithms, DAGGER. Specifically, if the class of policies is sufficiently expressive to contain the expert policy, we prove that DAGGER achieves constant regret. Unlike previous bounds that require the losses to be strongly-convex, our result only requires the weaker assumption that the losses be strongly-convex with respect to the policy's sufficient statistics (not its parameterization). In order to ensure convergence for a wider class of policies and losses, we augment DAGGER with an additional regularization term. In particular, we propose a variant of Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) and its adaptive variant for OIL and develop a memory-efficient implementation, which matches the memory requirements of FTL. Assuming that the loss functions are smooth and convex with respect to the parameters of the policy, we also prove that FTRL achieves constant regret for any sufficiently expressive policy class, while retaining $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret in the worst-case. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these algorithms with experiments on synthetic and high-dimensional control tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Painless Policy Optimization for Constrained MDPs

We study policy optimization in an infinite horizon, $γ$-discounted constrained Markov decision process (CMDP). Our objective is to return a policy that achieves large expected reward with a small constraint violation. We consider the online setting with linear function approximation and assume global access to the corresponding features. We propose a generic primal-dual framework that allows us to bound the reward sub-optimality and constraint violation for arbitrary algorithms in terms of their primal and dual regret on online linear optimization problems. We instantiate this framework to use coin-betting algorithms and propose the Coin Betting Politex (CBP) algorithm. Assuming that the action-value functions are $\varepsilon_b$-close to the span of the $d$-dimensional state-action features and no sampling errors, we prove that $T$ iterations of CBP result in an $O\left(\frac{1}{(1 - γ)^3 \sqrt{T}} + \frac{\varepsilon_b\sqrt{d}}{(1 - γ)^2} \right)$ reward sub-optimality and an $O\left(\frac{1}{(1 - γ)^2 \sqrt{T}} + \frac{\varepsilon_b \sqrt{d}}{1 - γ} \right)$ constraint violation. Importantly, unlike gradient descent-ascent and other recent methods, CBP does not require extensive hyperparameter tuning. Via experiments on synthetic and Cartpole environments, we demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of CBP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Adaptive Gradient Methods Converge Faster with Over-Parameterization (but you should do a line-search)

Adaptive gradient methods are typically used for training over-parameterized models. To better understand their behaviour, we study a simplistic setting -- smooth, convex losses with models over-parameterized enough to interpolate the data. In this setting, we prove that AMSGrad with constant step-size and momentum converges to the minimizer at a faster $O(1/T)$ rate. When interpolation is only approximately satisfied, constant step-size AMSGrad converges to a neighbourhood of the solution at the same rate, while AdaGrad is robust to the violation of interpolation. However, even for simple convex problems satisfying interpolation, the empirical performance of both methods heavily depends on the step-size and requires tuning, questioning their adaptivity. We alleviate this problem by automatically determining the step-size using stochastic line-search or Polyak step-sizes. With these techniques, we prove that both AdaGrad and AMSGrad retain their convergence guarantees, without needing to know problem-dependent constants. Empirically, we demonstrate that these techniques improve the convergence and generalization of adaptive gradient methods across tasks, from binary classification with kernel mappings to multi-class classification with deep networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Combining Bayesian Optimization and Lipschitz Optimization

Bayesian optimization and Lipschitz optimization have developed alternative techniques for optimizing black-box functions. They each exploit a different form of prior about the function. In this work, we explore strategies to combine these techniques for better global optimization. In particular, we propose ways to use the Lipschitz continuity assumption within traditional BO algorithms, which we call Lipschitz Bayesian optimization (LBO). This approach does not increase the asymptotic runtime and in some cases drastically improves the performance (while in the worst-case the performance is similar). Indeed, in a particular setting, we prove that using the Lipschitz information yields the same or a better bound on the regret compared to using Bayesian optimization on its own. Moreover, we propose a simple heuristics to estimate the Lipschitz constant, and prove that a growing estimate of the Lipschitz constant is in some sense ``harmless''. Our experiments on 15 datasets with 4 acquisition functions show that in the worst case LBO performs similar to the underlying BO method while in some cases it performs substantially better. Thompson sampling in particular typically saw drastic improvements (as the Lipschitz information corrected for its well-known ``over-exploration'' phenomenon) and its LBO variant often outperformed other acquisition functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fast and Furious Convergence: Stochastic Second Order Methods under Interpolation

We consider stochastic second-order methods for minimizing smooth and strongly-convex functions under an interpolation condition satisfied by over-parameterized models. Under this condition, we show that the regularized subsampled Newton method (R-SSN) achieves global linear convergence with an adaptive step-size and a constant batch-size. By growing the batch size for both the subsampled gradient and Hessian, we show that R-SSN can converge at a quadratic rate in a local neighbourhood of the solution. We also show that R-SSN attains local linear convergence for the family of self-concordant functions. Furthermore, we analyze stochastic BFGS algorithms in the interpolation setting and prove their global linear convergence. We empirically evaluate stochastic L-BFGS and a "Hessian-free" implementation of R-SSN for binary classification on synthetic, linearly-separable datasets and real datasets under a kernel mapping. Our experimental results demonstrate the fast convergence of these methods, both in terms of the number of iterations and wall-clock time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Old Dog Learns New Tricks: Randomized UCB for Bandit Problems

We propose $\tt RandUCB$, a bandit strategy that builds on theoretically derived confidence intervals similar to upper confidence bound (UCB) algorithms, but akin to Thompson sampling (TS), it uses randomization to trade off exploration and exploitation. In the $K$-armed bandit setting, we show that there are infinitely many variants of $\tt RandUCB$, all of which achieve the minimax-optimal $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{K T})$ regret after $T$ rounds. Moreover, for a specific multi-armed bandit setting, we show that both UCB and TS can be recovered as special cases of $\tt RandUCB$. For structured bandits, where each arm is associated with a $d$-dimensional feature vector and rewards are distributed according to a linear or generalized linear model, we prove that $\tt RandUCB$ achieves the minimax-optimal $\widetilde{O}(d \sqrt{T})$ regret even in the case of infinitely many arms. Through experiments in both the multi-armed and structured bandit settings, we demonstrate that $\tt RandUCB$ matches or outperforms TS and other randomized exploration strategies. Our theoretical and empirical results together imply that $\tt RandUCB$ achieves the best of both worlds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

To Each Optimizer a Norm, To Each Norm its Generalization

We study the implicit regularization of optimization methods for linear models interpolating the training data in the under-parametrized and over-parametrized regimes. Since it is difficult to determine whether an optimizer converges to solutions that minimize a known norm, we flip the problem and investigate what is the corresponding norm minimized by an interpolating solution. Using this reasoning, we prove that for over-parameterized linear regression, projections onto linear spans can be used to move between different interpolating solutions. For under-parameterized linear classification, we prove that for any linear classifier separating the data, there exists a family of quadratic norms ||.||_P such that the classifier's direction is the same as that of the maximum P-margin solution. For linear classification, we argue that analyzing convergence to the standard maximum l2-margin is arbitrary and show that minimizing the norm induced by the data results in better generalization. Furthermore, for over-parameterized linear classification, projections onto the data-span enable us to use techniques from the under-parameterized setting. On the empirical side, we propose techniques to bias optimizers towards better generalizing solutions, improving their test performance. We validate our theoretical results via synthetic experiments, and use the neural tangent kernel to handle non-linear models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access