Source author record

Shanmuka Shivashankara

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-ph hep-ex

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2015arXiv

$Λ_b \to Λ_c τ\barν_τ$ Decay in the Standard Model and with New Physics

Recently hints of lepton flavor non-universality emerged when the BaBar Collaboration observed deviations from the standard model predictions in $R(D^{(*)}) \equiv {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} τ^- {\barν}_τ) / {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \ell^- {\barν}_\ell)$ ( $\ell =e,μ$ ). Another test of this non-universality can be in the semi leptonic $Λ_{b}\toΛ_{c}τ\barν_τ$ decay. In this work we present predictions for this decay in the standard model and in the presence of new-physics operators with different Lorentz structures. We present the most general four-fold angular distribution for this decay including new physics. For phenomenology, we focus on predictions for the decay rate and the differential distribution in the momentum transfer squared $q^2$ . In particular, we calculate $R_{Λ_{b}} = \frac{BR[Λ_b \to Λ_c τ\barν_τ]}{BR[Λ_b \to Λ_c \ell \barν_{\ell}]}$ where $\ell$ represents $μ$ or $e$ , and find the standard model prediction to be around $0.3$ while the new physics operators can increase or slightly decrease this value.

preprint2015arXiv

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

At present, there are several hints of lepton flavor non-universality. The LHCb Collaboration has measured $R_K\equiv{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ μ^+ μ^-)/{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ e^+ e^-)$ , and the BaBar Collaboration has measured $R(D^{(*)}) \equiv {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} τ^- {\barν}_τ) / {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \ell^- {\barν}_\ell)$ ( $\ell = e,μ$ ). In all cases, the experimental results differ from the standard model predictions by 2-3 $σ$ . Recently, an explanation of the $R_K$ puzzle was proposed in which new physics (NP) generates a neutral-current operator involving only third-generation particles. Now, assuming the scale of NP is much larger than the weak scale, this NP operator must be made invariant under the full $SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ gauge group. In this Letter, we note that, when this is done, a new charged-current operator can appear, and this can explain the $R(D^{(*)})$ puzzle. A more precise measurement of the double ratio $R(D)/R(D^*)$ can rule out this model.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Shanmuka Shivashankara

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

$Λ_b \to Λ_c τ\barν_τ$ Decay in the Standard Model and with New Physics

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Shanmuka Shivashankara

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

Λb→ΛcτνˉτΛ_b \to Λ_c τ\barν_τΛb​→Λc​τνˉτ​ Decay in the Standard Model and with New Physics

Simultaneous Explanation of the RKR_KRK​ and R(D(∗))R(D^{(*)})R(D(∗)) Puzzles

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

$Λ_b \to Λ_c τ\barν_τ$ Decay in the Standard Model and with New Physics

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles