Source author record

Shangbin Yang

Shangbin Yang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph.SR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Buildup of the Magnetic Flux Ropes in Homologous Solar Eruptions

Homologous coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are an interesting phenomenon, and it is possible to investigate the formation of CMEs by comparing multi-CMEs under a homologous physical condition. AR 11283 had been present on the solar surface for several days when a bipole emerged on 2011 September 4. Its positive polarity collided with the pre-existing negative polarity belonging to a different bipole, producing recurrent solar activities along the polarity inversion line (PIL) between the colliding polarities, namely the so-called collisional PIL (cPIL). Our results show that a large amount of energy and helicity were built up in the form of magnetic flux ropes (MFRs), with recurrent release and accumulation processes. These MFRs were built up along the cPIL. A flux deficit method is adopted and shows that magnetic cancellation happens along the cPIL due to the collisional shearing scenario proposed by Chintzoglou et al. The total amount of canceled flux was $\sim$0.7$\times$10$^{21}$ Mx with an uncertainty of $\sim$13.2$\%$ within the confidence region of the 30$^\circ$ sun-center distance. The canceled flux amounts to 24$\%$ of the total unsigned flux of the bipolar magnetic region. The results show that the magnetic fields beside the cPIL are very sheared, and the average shear angle is above 70$^\circ$ after the collision. The fast expansion of the twist kernels of the MFRs and the continuous eruptive activities are both driven by the collisional shearing process. These results are important for better understanding the buildup process of the MFRs associated with homologous solar eruptions.

preprint2022arXiv

Comparison of Two Methods for Calculating Magnetic Helicity in the Solar Corona

Duo to the large magnetic Reynolds number, the magnetic helicity originating from the solar interior can be carried away through the photosphere into the corona. However, the relationship between the accumulated magnetic helicity flux through the photosphere and the magnetic helicity in the corona is still unclear. By selecting 36 newly emerging active regions in the 23rd solar cycle, we apply optical flow methods to derive the accumulated magnetic helicity through the photosphere ($H_m^p$) by using the sequential longitudinal magnetograms, use nonlinear force-free field extrapolation to obtain the 3D coronal magnetic field, and adopt finite volume methods to calculate the instantaneous relative magnetic helicity in the corona ($H_m^c$) by using vector magnetograms. It is found that the local correlation tracking (LCT)-based $H_m^p$ is larger than $H_m^c$ in $1"$, and that the Differential Affine Velocity Estimator-based $H_m^p$ is more consistent with $H_m^c$ than the LCT-based $H_m^p$. $H_m^p$ is more consistent with $H_m^c$ in evaluation from $2"$ than from $1"$. Moreover, $H_m^c - H_m^p$ systematically shows consistency with the Hemispheric Helicity Rule (over 55\%), no matter which resolution and method are used. These estimations suggest that the consistency of $H_m^c$ and $H_m^p$ is partly dependent on the resolution of the magnetograms and the calculation methods.

preprint2016arXiv

Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar magnetic field. Part I: Finite volume methods

Magnetic helicity is a conserved quantity of ideal magneto-hydrodynamics characterized by an inverse turbulent cascade. Accordingly, it is often invoked as one of the basic physical quantities driving the generation and structuring of magnetic fields in a variety of astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. We provide here the first systematic comparison of six existing methods for the estimation of the helicity of magnetic fields known in a finite volume. All such methods are reviewed, benchmarked, and compared with each other, and specifically tested for accuracy and sensitivity to errors. To that purpose, we consider four groups of numerical tests, ranging from solutions of the three-dimensional, force-free equilibrium, to magneto-hydrodynamical numerical simulations. Almost all methods are found to produce the same value of magnetic helicity within few percent in all tests. In the more solar-relevant and realistic of the tests employed here, the simulation of an eruptive flux rope, the spread in the computed values obtained by all but one method is only 3%, indicating the reliability and mutual consistency of such methods in appropriate parameter ranges. However, methods show differences in the sensitivity to numerical resolution and to errors in the solenoidal property of the input fields. In addition to finite volume methods, we also briefly discuss a method that estimates helicity from the field lines' twist, and one that exploits the field's value at one boundary and a coronal minimal connectivity instead of a pre-defined three-dimensional magnetic-field solution.

preprint2013arXiv

Method of Relative Magnetic Helicity Computation II: Boundary Conditions for the Vector Potentials

We have proposed a method to calculate the relative magnetic helicity in a finite volume as given the magnetic field in the former paper (Yang et al. {\it Solar Physics}, {\bf 283}, 369, 2013). This method requires that the magnetic flux to be balanced on all the side boundaries of the considered volume. In this paper, we propose a scheme to obtain the vector potentials at the boundaries to remove the above restriction. We also used a theoretical model (Low and Lou, {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 352}, 343, 1990) to test our scheme.