BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shahid Khan

Shahid Khan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMathematical Softwarenucl-exphysics.ins-detSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

BDDs Strike Back: Efficient Analysis of Static and Dynamic Fault Trees

Fault trees are a key model in reliability analysis. Classical static fault trees (SFT) can best be analysed using binary decision diagrams (BDD). State-based techniques are favorable for the more expressive dynamic fault trees (DFT). This paper combines the best of both worlds by following Dugan's approach: dynamic sub-trees are analysed via model checking Markov models and replaced by basic events capturing the obtained failure probabilities. The resulting SFT is then analysed via BDDs. We implemented this approach in the Storm model checker. Extensive experiments (a) compare our pure BDD-based analysis of SFTs to various existing SFT analysis tools, (b) indicate the benefits of our efficient calculations for multiple time points and the assessment of the mean-time-to-failure, and (c) show that our implementation of Dugan's approach significantly outperforms pure Markovian analysis of DFTs. Our implementation Storm-dft is currently the only tool supporting efficient analysis for both SFTs and DFTs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Machine Learning Application for $\mathbfΛ$ Hyperon Reconstruction in CBM at FAIR

The Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR will investigate the QCD phase diagram in the region of high net-baryon densities. Enhanced production of strange baryons, such as the most abundantly produced $Λ$ hyperons, can signal transition to a new phase of the QCD matter. In this work, the CBM performance for reconstruction of the $Λ$ hyperon via its decay to proton and $π^{-}$ is presented. Decay topology reconstruction is implemented in the Particle-Finder Simple (PFSimple) package with Machine Learning algorithms providing efficient selection of the decays and high signal to background ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Various Ways to Quantify BDMPs

A Boolean logic driven Markov process (BDMP) is a dependability analysis model that defines a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC). This formalism has high expressive power, yet it remains readable because its graphical representation stays close to standard fault trees. The size of a BDMP is roughly speaking proportional to the size of the system it models, whereas the size of the CTMC specified by this BDMP suffers from exponential growth. Thus quantifying large BDMPs can be a challenging task. The most general method to quantify them is Monte Carlo simulation, but this may be intractable for highly reliable systems. On the other hand, some subcategories of BDMPs can be processed with much more efficient methods. For example, BDMPs without repairs can be translated into dynamic fault trees, a formalism accepted as an input of the STORM model checker, that performs numerical calculations on sparse matrices, or they can be processed with the tool FIGSEQ that explores paths going to a failure state and calculates their probabilities. BDMPs with repairs can be quantified by FIGSEQ (BDMPs capturing quickly and completely repairable behaviors are solved by a different algorithm), and by the I&AB (Initiator and All Barriers) method, recently published and implemented in a prototype version of RISKSPECTRUM PSA. This tool, based exclusively on Boolean representations looks for and quantifies minimal cut sets of the system, i.e., minimal combinations of component failures that induce the loss of the system. This allows a quick quantification of large models with repairable components, standby redundancies and some other types of dependencies between omponents. All these quantification methods have been tried on a benchmark whose definition was published at the MARS 2017 workshop: the model of emergency power supplies of a nuclear power plant. In this paper, after a recall of the theoretical principles of the various quantification methods, we compare their performances on that benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access