Researcher profile

Shahariar Sarkar

Shahariar Sarkar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Nuclear matrix elements for $λ$ mechanism of $0νββ$ of $^{48}$Ca in nuclear shell-model: Closure versus nonclosure approach

The $λ$ and $m_{ββ}$ mechanisms of neutrinoless double beta decay ($0νββ$) occur with light neutrino exchange via $W_L-W_R$, and $W_L-W_L$ mediation, respectively. In the present study, we calculate the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) for the $m_{ββ}$ and $λ$ mechanisms of $0νββ$, which has origin in the left-right symmetric model with right-handed gauge boson at TeV scale. The NMEs are calculated for one of the $0νββ$ decaying isotope $^{48}$Ca in the interacting nuclear shell-model using the GXPF1A effective interaction of $pf$-shell. The NMEs are calculated in both closure and nonclosure approaches using four different methods: closure, running closure, running nonclosure, and mixed methods. All the NMEs are calculated incorporating the effects of the finite size of nucleons and the revisited higher order terms such as isoscalar and weak magnetism terms of the nucleon currents. Inclusion of the short-range nature of nucleon-nucleon interaction in Miller-Spencer, CD-Bonn, and AV18 parametrizations is also taken care of. The comparative dependence of the running closure and running nonclosure NMEs with the spin-parity of the allowed states of intermediate nucleus $^{48}$Sc, the coupled spin-parity of the two initial decaying neutrons and the final two protons, the cutoff excitation energy of $^{48}$Sc, the cutoff number of states of $^{48}$Sc are also examined. Results show that there are about 2-20\% enhancements in different types of total NMEs, calculated in the nonclosure approach as compared to the closure approach. The significant enhancements are found in the $M_{qGT}$ and $M_{qT}$ type NMEs for the inclusion of the higher-order terms of the nucleon currents.

preprint2020arXiv

Role of individual components of two-nucleon interaction in nuclear matrix elements of $2νββ$ and $0νββ$ of $^\textbf{48}$Ca: Beyond the closure approximation

In the present work, we examine the role of central (C), spin-orbit (SO) and tensor (T) components of two-nucleon interaction in the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) of the two-neutrino double beta decay ($2νββ$) and the light neutrino-exchange mechanism of neutrinoless double beta decay ($0νββ$) of $^{48}$Ca in closure approximation and nonclosure approach. The NMEs are calculated in the nuclear shell-model framework using two-nucleon effective interaction GXPF1A used for $pf$ shell. The decomposition of the shell model two-nucleon interaction into its individual components is performed using the spin-tensor decomposition (STD). The NMEs for $2νββ$ are calculated in running nonclosure method. The NMEs for $0νββ$ are calculated with four different methods, namely, closure, running closure, running nonclosure, and mixed method. Results show that the magnitude of NMEs for $2νββ$ decreases about 7\% with the C+SO component of the interaction as compared to the C component. The magnitude of NMEs is further decreased about 9\% by adding T component to the C+SO component. The NMEs of $0νββ$ calculated in running nonclosure method are enhanced by about 8-10\%, 8-10\%, and 9-12\%, respectively, as compared to corresponding NMEs calculated in running closure method with C, C+SO components and total (C+SO+T) GXPF1A interaction for different SRC parametrization. For both $2νββ$ and $0νββ$, the NMEs calculated with C+SO component is in opposite phase with the NMEs calculated with C component and the total GXPF1A interaction.