Source author record

Kanhaiya Jha

Kanhaiya Jha appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Role of individual components of two-nucleon interaction in nuclear matrix elements of $2νββ$ and $0νββ$ of $^\textbf{48}$Ca: Beyond the closure approximation

In the present work, we examine the role of central (C), spin-orbit (SO) and tensor (T) components of two-nucleon interaction in the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) of the two-neutrino double beta decay ($2νββ$) and the light neutrino-exchange mechanism of neutrinoless double beta decay ($0νββ$) of $^{48}$Ca in closure approximation and nonclosure approach. The NMEs are calculated in the nuclear shell-model framework using two-nucleon effective interaction GXPF1A used for $pf$ shell. The decomposition of the shell model two-nucleon interaction into its individual components is performed using the spin-tensor decomposition (STD). The NMEs for $2νββ$ are calculated in running nonclosure method. The NMEs for $0νββ$ are calculated with four different methods, namely, closure, running closure, running nonclosure, and mixed method. Results show that the magnitude of NMEs for $2νββ$ decreases about 7\% with the C+SO component of the interaction as compared to the C component. The magnitude of NMEs is further decreased about 9\% by adding T component to the C+SO component. The NMEs of $0νββ$ calculated in running nonclosure method are enhanced by about 8-10\%, 8-10\%, and 9-12\%, respectively, as compared to corresponding NMEs calculated in running closure method with C, C+SO components and total (C+SO+T) GXPF1A interaction for different SRC parametrization. For both $2νββ$ and $0νββ$, the NMEs calculated with C+SO component is in opposite phase with the NMEs calculated with C component and the total GXPF1A interaction.