Source author record

Shahar Nevo

Shahar Nevo appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

17works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

17 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Differential inequalities and a Marty-type criterion for quasi-normality

We show that the family of all holomorphic functions $f$ in a domain $D$ satisfying $$\frac{|f^{(k)}|}{1+|f|}(z)\le C \qquad \mbox{ for all } z\in D$$ (where $k$ is a natural number and $C>0$) is quasi-normal. Furthermore, we give a general counterexample to show that for $α>1$ and $k\ge2$ the condition $$\frac{|f^{(k)}|}{1+|f|^α}(z)\le C \qquad \mbox{ for all } z\in D$$ does not imply quasi-normality.

preprint2016arXiv

Some counterexamples on the behaviour of real-valued functions and their derivatives

We discuss some surprising phenomena from basic calculus related to oscillating functions and to the theorem on the differentiability of inverse functions. Among other things, we see that a continuously differentiable function with a strict minimum doesn't have to be decreasing to the left nor increasing to the right of the minimum, we present a function whose derivative is discontinuous at one point and has a strict minimum at this point (i.e. it oscillates only in one direction), we compare several definitions of inflection point, and we discuss a general version of the theorem on the derivative of inverse functions where continuity of the inverse function is assumed merely at one point.

preprint2013arXiv

Differential inequalities and quasi-normal families

We show that a family ${\cal F}$ of meromorphic functions in a domain $D$ satisfying $$\frac{|f^{(k)}|}{1+|f^{(j)}|^α}(z)\ge C \qquad \mbox{for all} z\in D \mbox{and all} f\in {\cal F}$$ (where $k$ and $j$ are integers with $k>j\ge 0$ and $C>0$, $α>1$ are real numbers) is quasi-normal. Furthermore, if all functions in ${\cal F}$ are holomorphic, the order of quasi-normality of ${\cal F}$ is at most $j-1$. The proof relies on the Zalcman rescaling method and previous results on differential inequalities constituting normality.

preprint2011arXiv

A criterion of normality based on a single holomorphic function II

In this paper, we continue to discuss normality based on a single\linebreak holomorphic function. We obtain the following result. Let $\CF$ be a family of functions holomorphic on a domain $D\subset\mathbb C$. Let $k\ge2$ be an integer and let $h(\not\equiv0)$ be a holomorphic function on $D$, such that $h(z)$ has no common zeros with any $f\in\CF$. Assume also that the following two conditions hold for every $f\in\CF$:\linebreak %{enumerate} [(a)] (a) $f(z)=0\Longrightarrow f'(z)=h(z)$ and %[(b)] (b) $f'(z)=h(z)\Longrightarrow|f^{(k)}(z)|\le c$, where $c$ is a constant. Then $\CF$ is normal on $D$. %{enumerate} A geometrical approach is used to arrive at the result which significantly improves the previous results of the authors, \textit{A criterion of normality based on a single holomorphic function}, Acta Math. Sinica, English Series (1) \textbf{27} (2011), 141--154 and of Chang, Fang, and Zalcman, \textit{Normal families of holomorphic functions}, Illinois Math. J. (1) \textbf{48} (2004), 319--337. We also deal with two other similar criterions of normality. Our results are shown to be sharp.

preprint2011arXiv

A Non explicit counterexample to a problem of quasi-normality

In 1986, S.Y. Li and H.Xie proved the following theorem:Let k>=2 and let F be a family of functions meromorphic in some domain D, all of whose zeros are of multiplicity at least k. Then F is normal if and only if the family F_k={f^(k)/(1+|f^k+1|):f in F} is locally uniformly bounded in D. Here we give, in the case k=2, a counterexample to show that if the condition on the multiplicities of the zeros is omitted, then the local uniform boundedness of F_2 does not imply even quasi-normality. In addition, we give a simpler proof for the Li-Xie Theorem that does not use Nevanlinna Theory which was used in the original proof.